Business
Trump’s Energy Gambit: Power Play or Risky Bet?
Trump’s energy plan prioritises fossil fuels, faces legal challenges, political opposition, and global ramifications

In a move set to stir significant political and economic debate, former President Donald Trump announced plans to declare a national energy emergency, should he return to the White House. This declaration, aimed at expanding presidential powers, underscores his vision of a reinvigorated domestic energy policy designed to counter what he perceives as threats to American energy independence. Trump, addressing a crowd in Des Moines, Iowa, on Saturday, stated his intent to issue the declaration within days of regaining office. “We’re going to take back control of our energy future,” he proclaimed. “The radical policies of the left have left us weak, dependent, and at the mercy of foreign powers. That ends under my administration.”
The proposed emergency declaration seeks to bypass traditional legislative constraints, granting the president broader authority to accelerate energy projects, suspend certain environmental regulations, and potentially restrict foreign energy imports. Critics argue that such a move could lead to overreach and exacerbate climate concerns, while supporters hail it as a necessary step to prioritize U.S. energy dominance.
A Bold Agenda
Trump’s plan reflects his administration’s energy-first ethos during his initial term, which included withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement and rolling back Obama-era environmental regulations. The proposed emergency powers would likely enable expedited approval of oil and gas drilling projects, reopening federal lands for energy extraction, and revitalizing coal operations. The focus, Trump claims, is to reduce energy costs for Americans and create jobs in traditional energy sectors. “We have the resources, we have the technology, and we have the will,” Trump said during his address. “What we don’t have is time to waste on bureaucratic red tape while our enemies laugh at us.”
The declaration may also include measures to incentivize investments in U.S.-based energy infrastructure, such as pipelines and refineries while curtailing reliance on renewable energy mandates. Trump’s rhetoric suggests a stark contrast to the Biden administration’s focus on green energy initiatives and climate goals.
Declaring a national energy emergency would be unprecedented, raising significant constitutional questions. Legal experts warn that such an action could face challenges in the courts, particularly regarding the scope of presidential authority under emergency declarations.
“While the National Emergencies Act provides the president with broad discretion, it is not a blank check,” said Laura Jenkins, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University. “The courts will scrutinize whether an energy emergency meets the legal threshold and whether the president’s actions are proportional.”
The political fallout is expected to be equally contentious. Democratic leaders have already denounced the proposal as a “power grab” designed to benefit fossil fuel interests at the expense of environmental sustainability and climate action.
“This isn’t about energy security. It’s about dismantling decades of progress to combat the climate crisis,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer in a statement. “We won’t stand idly by while the future of our planet is sold to the highest bidder.”
Conversely, Republican allies have rallied behind Trump, framing the move as a necessary corrective to what they describe as the Biden administration’s “war on American energy.”
“President Trump is putting America first again,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). “This declaration will restore our energy independence, lower costs for families, and create jobs in communities across the country.”
The economic implications of Trump’s energy plan are profound. Supporters argue that the proposed measures will reduce energy costs, boost domestic production, and insulate the U.S. economy from geopolitical shocks. They cite rising energy prices and inflation as evidence of the need for immediate action.
However, economists caution that prioritizing fossil fuels over renewable energy could have long-term consequences.
“A short-term focus on traditional energy sources may provide temporary relief, but it risks delaying the necessary transition to sustainable energy systems,” said Dr. Alan Rivera, an energy economist at Stanford University. “This could leave the U.S. vulnerable to future economic and environmental shocks.”
Additionally, the potential rollback of environmental protections has sparked concern among climate advocates. They warn that increased emissions from expanded fossil fuel projects could exacerbate global warming and undermine international climate commitments.
Trump’s proposed policy shift could have far-reaching implications for global energy markets. Analysts predict that a resurgence of U.S. fossil fuel production could disrupt oil prices and strain relations with countries reliant on energy exports, including key OPEC members and Russia. Moreover, the move could undermine international climate agreements, such as the Paris Accord, which the Biden administration rejoined in 2021. European allies, already wary of Trump’s unilateral approach to foreign policy, may view the declaration as a step back from global cooperation on climate issues.
What’s Next?
As Trump continues to solidify his campaign platform, the proposed national energy emergency is poised to be a defining issue in the 2024 presidential race. With the stakes high for both the economy and the environment, the debate over America’s energy future will likely dominate headlines in the months to come. While Trump’s supporters view the plan as a bold step to reclaim American energy independence, his critics see it as a dangerous gamble with the planet’s future. As the nation waits to see whether Trump’s vision becomes reality, one thing is clear: the battle over energy policy is far from over.
Business
Scams Without Borders: How Asian Crime Syndicates Went Global
Asian scam syndicates expand globally, exploiting trafficking, tech, and weak law enforcement across continents

Once confined to Southeast Asia, particularly in countries like Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, scam operations orchestrated by Asian crime syndicates have now expanded their reach globally. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) reports that these operations are generating nearly $40 billion annually through various fraudulent activities, including romance scams, fake investment schemes, and illicit online gambling. This expansion is partly a response to intensified crackdowns in Southeast Asia, prompting these syndicates to relocate to regions with weaker law enforcement, such as parts of Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.
The Mechanics of Modern Scam Operations
These scam operations often involve large compounds where trafficked individuals are coerced into conducting online scams. Victims are lured with promises of legitimate employment but find themselves trapped in conditions akin to modern slavery. Their passports are confiscated, and they face threats of violence or worse if they fail to meet scam quotas. Technological advancements have further empowered these operations; the use of artificial intelligence, deepfakes, and cryptocurrencies make it easier to deceive victims and launder money, complicating efforts to trace and dismantle these networks.
Global Hotspots and Notorious Scams: Who’s Getting Hit the Hardest?
By 2025, the reach of Asian-organized scam operations has expanded far beyond their initial strongholds in Southeast Asia, now deeply affecting countries across Africa, Latin America, and parts of Europe. These syndicates are adapting quickly, exploiting regions with limited cyber enforcement capacity and regulatory oversight. Law enforcement actions in early 2025 in countries like Nigeria, Zambia, and Angola have revealed growing local footholds for scam infrastructure, often linked to trafficking networks relocating from Myanmar and Cambodia.
Latin America has also emerged as a major target zone. Brazilian authorities have reported a surge in online financial scams, many operated remotely through fraudulent crypto trading platforms linked to Southeast Asian crime syndicates. In a striking case in Peru in late 2023, authorities rescued over 40 trafficked Malaysians who had been forced to perpetrate cyber fraud under threat of violence — a scenario that’s becoming more frequent as scam centers globalize their labor sourcing.
Among the most infamous scams now circulating worldwide is the “pig butchering” scheme — a long-con tactic involving emotional manipulation and fraudulent crypto investments. The FBI reported that in 2024 alone, over 4,300 victims in the U.S. were directly affected by this scam, with global financial losses from such frauds reaching nearly $10 billion. Romance scams more broadly continue to flourish in the U.S., nearly 59,000 people lost an estimated $697.3 million in 2024, primarily through dating app and social media cons that escalated into financial exploitation.
Human Trafficking and Exploitation
A disturbing aspect of these operations is the human cost. According to the UN, at least 120,000 people in Myanmar and 100,000 in Cambodia are being held in scam compounds under duress. These individuals are often subjected to physical abuse, forced labor, and in some cases, threats of organ harvesting. The international nature of these crimes means that victims come from various countries, including Brazil, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, and Uzbekistan, highlighting the global reach and impact of these syndicates.
Challenges in Combating the Spread
Law enforcement agencies face significant hurdles in addressing this issue. The transnational nature of these crimes, coupled with the use of sophisticated technology and the exploitation of jurisdictions with weak governance, makes it difficult to coordinate effective responses. Moreover, the profitability of these operations provides little incentive for local authorities in some regions to take action. International operations like “Operation First Light 2024” have made some headway, resulting in thousands of arrests and the seizure of millions in assets. However, these efforts are often reactive and limited in scope, underscoring the need for a more proactive and coordinated global strategy.
Implications for Global Security and Economy
The proliferation of these scam operations poses a significant threat to global security and economic stability. The financial losses incurred by victims are substantial, with the United States alone reporting over $5.6 billion in losses to cryptocurrency scams in 2023. Beyond the economic impact, the human rights violations associated with these operations, including human trafficking and forced labor, represent a moral crisis that demands immediate attention. Failure to address these issues could lead to further destabilization in vulnerable regions and undermine international efforts to combat organized crime.
A Final Note
The expansion of Asian scam operations into a global network is a pressing issue that transcends borders and requires a unified international response. As these syndicates continue to evolve and adapt, so too must the strategies employed to dismantle them. This includes not only law enforcement actions but also efforts to address the underlying socio-economic factors that make individuals and regions susceptible to exploitation.
Business
The Magic Stalls: Why Disney’s Parks Are Losing Their Spark at Home
Disney’s U.S. theme parks face slowing attendance as travel costs rise and preferences shift

The allure of Disney’s theme parks, long a cornerstone of American tourism, is facing challenges as a slowdown in international visitors to the U.S. impacts attendance figures. Economic factors, shifting travel preferences, and rising costs are contributing to a complex landscape for Disney’s domestic parks.
Recent reports indicate that Disney’s domestic theme parks have experienced a stagnation in attendance growth. In 2024, domestic attendance was up just 1% compared to a 6% increase in 2023. Hotel bookings remained flat at 85% occupancy, and while guest spending saw a modest uptick, the overall operating profit declined by 3%.
Hugh Johnston, Disney’s Chief Financial Officer, attributed the decline to “moderation of consumer demand,” noting that rising food and labor costs have squeezed the parks’ profitability. He also highlighted that higher-income consumers are opting for international travel, taking advantage of the strong U.S. dollar, while lower-income consumers are feeling financial pressures that deter discretionary spending on vacations.
International Travel: A Competing Attraction
The strength of the U.S. dollar has made international destinations more appealing to American travelers. Len Testa, president of the trip planning website Touring Plans, observed that families are increasingly comparing the cost of a Disney vacation to trips abroad, often finding international travel to be a more memorable and cost-effective option.
This shift is not only affecting Disney but also other theme park operators. Universal and Six Flags have reported declines in revenue and guest attendance, signaling a broader trend in the industry. The cost of a Disney vacation has risen significantly, with the average price of a one-week vacation in the U.S. for one person estimated at $1,991. A family of four looking to visit Disney World should budget several thousand dollars, making alternative vacations like cruises or European trips more competitive.
Additionally, the introduction of paid services such as Lightning Lane, replacing the once-free FastPass+, and the discontinuation of complimentary services like airport shuttle buses, have altered the value proposition for visitors. These changes, coupled with steady ticket price increases, have led some to question whether Disney has reached a “price plateau” that could deter future attendance.
Disney’s Strategic Response
Despite these challenges, Disney remains optimistic about the long-term prospects of its parks. The company has announced plans to invest $60 billion over the next decade to expand and enhance its theme parks and cruise lines, aiming to attract new visitors and retain loyal fans.
Disney executives acknowledge the current “demand moderation” but believe that the parks’ unique offerings and strong intellectual property portfolio will continue to draw guests. They are actively monitoring attendance and guest spending while managing costs to navigate the current economic landscape.
Looking Ahead
As the travel industry adjusts to post-pandemic realities and economic fluctuations, Disney’s theme parks face the challenge of balancing affordability with the premium experiences that guests expect. The company’s substantial investments in park enhancements signal a commitment to maintaining its position as a leading destination, even as it adapts to changing consumer behaviors and preferences. The coming years will be pivotal in determining how Disney navigates these challenges and whether it can recapture the magic that has long defined its theme park experiences.
Business
Rare Earths Become China’s Sharpest Weapon Against America
China weaponizes rare earths in 2025, challenging U.S. tech, defence, and economic resilience

As trade hostilities between the United States and China deepen in 2025 under President Donald Trump’s renewed tariffs, China has turned to one of its most potent yet underappreciated weapons: rare earth elements. These obscure minerals, while rarely discussed outside industrial or scientific circles, are essential to the modern economy. From smartphones and electric vehicles to missile systems and MRI machines, rare earths are foundational to the technologies that power the 21st century. Unlike tariffs or duties, this is a front where China holds a commanding advantage—and where the U.S. faces steep obstacles to retaliate in kind.
What Are Rare Earths?
Rare earth elements comprise a group of seventeen metals that, despite their misleading name, are relatively abundant in the Earth’s crust. However, their extraction and refining are incredibly difficult, environmentally hazardous, and financially intensive. While the United States does have some deposits, it has long been dependent on China for the refined materials. According to the International Energy Agency, in 2023 China accounted for 61 percent of global mined rare earth output and a staggering 92 percent of the global processing capacity. This means that even if raw materials are mined elsewhere, they are typically shipped to China for refinement—a choke point Beijing controls with surgical precision.
These materials are essential in the production of permanent magnets that power the motors of electric vehicles and wind turbines, the data storage systems in hard drives, and even the compact engines used in consumer electronics. They are also critical to the defense industry, where they are embedded in guidance systems, jet propulsion, sonar arrays, and advanced medical technologies like MRI scanners.
April 2025: Beijing Pulls the Rare Earth Lever
Earlier this month, in direct response to President Trump’s imposition of a 34 percent tariff on a wide range of Chinese goods, the Chinese government enacted export restrictions on seven types of rare earths, specifically those used in high-performance magnets. These rules require all exporters to secure government licenses for these minerals and for any product containing even trace amounts of them. According to industry sources, including John Ormerod, founder of the rare earth consultancy JOC, shipments destined for American and European firms have already been halted while exporters scramble to understand and comply with the new licensing requirements.
The restrictions focus primarily on heavy rare earth elements, which are rarer than their lighter counterparts, more valuable on a per-kilogram basis, and significantly more difficult to separate and refine. These elements are indispensable for manufacturing the ultra-compact, high-strength magnets used in advanced electronics, military-grade equipment, and green energy applications. Joshua Ballard, CEO of USA Rare Earth, noted that China controls 98 percent of global heavy rare earth production. As a result, U.S. companies reliant on these materials for defense and tech production must now seek permission from the very government they are strategically opposing.
How Did China Corner the Market?
China’s dominance of this sector was not built overnight. Although rare earth mining in China began as early as the 1950s, it wasn’t until the late 1970s and 80s that the industry gained momentum. Leveraging low labor costs, loose environmental regulations, and imported refining technology—much of it originally developed in the United States, Japan, and Europe—China built a vertically integrated supply chain. It mastered not only the extraction of rare earths but the ability to refine, manipulate, and mass-produce the components essential to high-tech manufacturing. This long-term investment strategy was underscored in 1992 by former leader Deng Xiaoping, who famously declared, “While there is oil in the Middle East, China has rare earths”. Today, that prophecy is fulfilled.
The United States, once a pioneer in rare earth development, gradually ceded the market. As China ramped up its output, American firms found themselves unable to compete on cost. According to Ormerod, not only did these companies lose their competitive edge—they lost institutional knowledge and skilled labor. Once American manufacturing began to shutter its rare earth facilities, there was no easy path back. Meanwhile, China scaled up, modernized its refineries, and benefited from economies of scale and generous government subsidies. Between 2020 and 2023, 70 percent of all U.S. imports of rare earth compounds and metals came directly from China, according to a recent U.S. Geological Survey report.
Strategic Disruption, Surgical Strike
This isn’t China’s first use of rare earths as leverage. In 2010, it suspended shipments to Japan over a maritime dispute. More recently, it banned rare earth refining technology exports in 2023, a move designed to slow down competitors’ ability to catch up. Today, the strategy has evolved into something more precise. Rather than blanket bans, the Chinese government is deploying highly targeted restrictions—focusing on magnets, alloys, and high-purity derivatives that are fundamental to advanced technologies.
This approach hits particularly hard in sectors that depend on ultra-specialized components: aerospace, automotive, semiconductor manufacturing, and precision defense technologies. As economist Justin Wolfers told reporters, China is demonstrating its capacity to “exert incredible economic might by being strategic and surgical”.
Trump’s Executive Reaction: The Critical Minerals Probe
In response to these developments, President Trump signed an executive order to launch a national security investigation into America’s reliance on imported critical minerals. His statement cited growing concerns over the vulnerability of U.S. supply chains, warning that this dependency could jeopardize national defense readiness, price stability, and broader economic resilience. While Trump’s administration continues to wield tariffs as a primary instrument of pressure, this executive action acknowledges the deeper industrial threat posed by China’s rare earth grip.
Is the U.S. Ready to Compete?
The Biden administration, and now Trump’s second term, have poured hundreds of millions into domestic rare earth initiatives. Since 2020, the Department of Defense has invested over $439 million in rare earth development projects with the goal of achieving a self-sustaining mine-to-magnet supply chain by 2027. Some American firms are beginning to gain ground. Phoenix Tailings, a Massachusetts-based startup, has developed a clean technology process for refining rare earths without waste or emissions. The company currently produces 40 metric tons of rare earth alloys annually and plans to expand tenfold with a new facility in New Hampshire. Similarly, USA Rare Earth is constructing a plant in Texas that will eventually manufacture 5,000 tons of rare earth magnets each year. The company also owns a heavy rare earth deposit in West Texas containing all the elements targeted by China’s latest restrictions.
Still, challenges remain formidable. While the U.S. has raw materials and promising startups, it lacks the commercial-scale infrastructure and industrial workforce needed to process rare earths at competitive prices. The technological processes, environmental clearances, and capital requirements involved are immense. Even with federal support, industry leaders acknowledge that catching up to China could take years—if not a decade.
A New Cold War?
The rare earth battle is not merely an economic skirmish. It is part of a broader geopolitical contest over technological supremacy, resource security, and strategic autonomy. Control over rare earths increasingly means control over the future of clean energy, artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles, and next-generation defense systems. By asserting dominance through these latest export controls, China is not just retaliating against U.S. tariffs—it is signaling its industrial confidence and geopolitical maturity.
The United States now faces a stark choice: either rebuild the supply chains it dismantled decades ago or continue operating at the mercy of a rival superpower that has mastered the art of converting obscure minerals into strategic leverage.
-
Opinion2 months ago
How I Spent My Week: Roasting Musk, Martian ICE, and Government Absurdities
-
Business3 months ago
Why Are Planes Falling from the Sky?
-
Politics4 months ago
Comrade Workwear Unveils ‘Most Wanted CEO’ Playing Cards Amidst Controversy
-
Opinion4 months ago
From Le Pen to Trump: The Far-Right Legacy Behind a Presidential Comeback
-
Opinion2 months ago
Oval Office Chaos: How Trump and Zelensky’s Meeting Went Off the Rails
-
Opinion3 months ago
2025: The Turning Point in Global Power and Security
-
Opinion2 months ago
The UAE’s Growing Role in Russia-Ukraine Peace Negotiations
-
Business3 weeks ago
Trump’s ‘Gold Card’ Visa: Citizenship for Sale at $5 Million a Piece