Connect with us

Opinion

Musk, Gabbard, Flynn: How Social Media Fuels Ukraine Money Laundering Allegations

Ukraine money laundering claims spread as fact-checking weakens, oversight erodes, and misinformation thrives

Published

on

Truth, Misinformation, and the Collapse of Oversight

In the ever-polarized world of global politics, Ukraine has once again found itself at the center of controversy, this time due to claims of large-scale money laundering. Prominent figures, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Head of the Department of Government Efficiency Elon Musk, and former National Security Advisor Lieutenant General (Ret.) Michael Flynn, have recently taken to X (formerly Twitter) to allege that Ukraine is a “giant money laundering scheme,” reigniting debates over the veracity of such claims.

Despite mounting evidence that these accusations are unsubstantiated, a perfect storm of deregulation, social media misinformation, and weakened government oversight has allowed these narratives to spread unchecked. The restructuring of fact-checking mechanisms on platforms like Meta and X, combined with the U.S. Treasury Department’s recent decision to halt enforcement of a key anti-money laundering law, has fueled an environment in which financial transparency is being eroded, misinformation is thriving, and public trust in institutions is being undermined.

The Resurgence of the Ukraine Money Laundering Allegation

The claim that Ukraine serves as a vast money laundering operation is not new. It has been repeatedly circulated by right-wing political figures and conspiracy theorists, particularly in the United States, since the escalation of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022.

The latest wave of accusations surfaced after recent posts from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Head of the Department of Government Efficiency Elon Musk, and former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who suggested that U.S. financial aid to Ukraine was being siphoned off through corrupt networks.

Musk, who has become increasingly vocal on geopolitical matters, responded to a post from Gabbard that called Ukraine a “money laundering operation masquerading as a democracy,” stating that “this should be investigated.” Flynn, who has long promoted conspiracy narratives, doubled down on the claim, stating that “Zelenskyy’s regime is the biggest fraud in history.” These assertions, however, are not backed by credible evidence.

The Collapse of Fact-Checking on Social Media

At the same time these claims gained traction, major social media platforms have dismantled their fact-checking programs, making it easier for false narratives to spread.

Advertisement

Meta’s Shift to Community-Based Moderation

In January 2025, Meta (formerly Facebook) announced the termination of its third-party fact-checking program in the United States, shifting instead to a community-based moderation system, similar to X’s Community Notes. CEO Mark Zuckerberg framed the decision as a move toward “free expression,” positioning it as a response to growing concerns over censorship.

However, critics argue that relying on user-generated content for fact-checking weakens the ability to combat disinformation, particularly in politically sensitive topics. Reports indicate that harmful narratives—including those concerning elections, public health, and Ukraine—have been allowed to spread unchallenged since the policy change.

X’s (Formerly Twitter) Community Notes System

Under Musk’s leadership since 2022, X implemented the Community Notes feature, a crowdsourced fact-checking system designed to provide context to misleading posts. However, its effectiveness remains highly questionable. Critics argue that the system often fails to flag false narratives in a timely manner, allowing misinformation to persist. For example, election-related misinformation and claims about Ukraine’s aid funds being laundered have been left unchecked for weeks.

Additionally, concerns have emerged that the platform can be “gamed” by coordinated groups, manipulating which posts receive corrections through Community Notes. Musk himself recently acknowledged that state-sponsored actors may be exploiting the system to push certain narratives.

The U.S. Treasury’s Decision to Halt Enforcement of Anti-Money Laundering Laws

As social media platforms dismantle their fact-checking systems, government institutions are also scaling back oversight mechanisms, further weakening financial transparency.

Advertisement

On March 2, 2025, the U.S. Treasury Department announced that it would stop enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a key anti-money laundering law that required millions of businesses to disclose their beneficial owners. The law was originally designed to combat financial crimes and prevent the use of anonymous shell companies for illicit activities.

The Treasury’s decision follows the Trump administration’s stance that the law places unnecessary burdens on businesses. However, financial transparency advocates warn that this move will allow criminals and corrupt actors to shield their financial activities from scrutiny.

By halting enforcement of the CTA, the U.S. government is simultaneously reducing oversight of financial crimes while figures like Musk and Gabbard amplify unverified claims of money laundering in Ukraine. This contradiction undermines legitimate anti-corruption efforts while enabling the very financial secrecy that allows illicit money to flow unnoticed.

The Firing of Inspectors General: Undermining Oversight

Further compounding the erosion of oversight, President Donald Trump has dismissed 17 inspectors general across various federal agencies, weakening government accountability.

Inspectors general are responsible for investigating fraud, waste, and abuse in government spending, making their removal particularly concerning amid allegations of corruption surrounding Ukraine aid. Critics argue that these firings eliminate key safeguards that ensure financial transparency, allowing unchecked disinformation to shape public perception.

The Danger of Unchecked Disinformation

The intersection of deregulation, political propaganda, and the collapse of oversight mechanisms poses a serious threat to public discourse. The Ukraine money laundering narrative serves as a prime example of how misinformation, once introduced, can persist unchallenged when both governments and social media platforms abdicate their fact-checking responsibilities.

Advertisement

This trend extends beyond Ukraine. By dismantling fact-checking systems, weakening financial regulations, and eliminating government watchdogs, a vacuum is created where false narratives thrive. In the case of Ukraine, disinformation could erode Western support for the country’s war effort against Russia, a goal that directly benefits the Kremlin’s strategic interests.

The claim that Ukraine is a large-scale money laundering operation is not backed by credible evidence, yet it continues to spread due to the influence of high-profile figures like Gabbard, Musk, and Flynn.

At the same time, fact-checking mechanisms on X and Meta have been weakened, the U.S. Treasury has suspended enforcement of anti-money laundering laws, and Trump has fired independent government watchdogs.

This perfect storm of deregulation and disinformation ensures that financial corruption narratives can spread freely, while actual corruption becomes harder to detect.

The public trust in institutions will continue to erode, allowing false narratives to shape policy in ways that benefit those who profit from deception rather than truth.

Musk, Gabbard, Flynn: How Social Media Fuels Ukraine Money Laundering Allegations
Truth Misinformation and the Collapse of Oversight

Dean Mikkelsen is a freelance writer and contributor at The Washington Eye, specialising in geopolitics, energy, and security. With over two decades of editorial experience across the Middle East and the United States, he offers nuanced analysis shaped by both on-the-ground reporting and strategic insight.

Dean’s work spans a range of publications, including Oil & Gas Middle East, Utilities Middle East, and Defence & Security Middle East, where he covers topics from energy transitions to maritime threats. He has also contributed to titles such as The Energy Report Middle East and MENA Daily Chronicle, providing in-depth coverage on regional developments.

In addition to his writing, Dean has been featured as an expert commentator on platforms such as BBC Persia and ABC News Australia, and has been quoted in The National and Arabian Business.

An engineer by training, Dean combines technical knowledge with journalistic rigour to explore the intersections of diplomacy, defence, and trade in a complex global landscape.

Opinion

The Washington Eye: A Bold Vision in Global and U.S. Journalism

Published

on

Washington eye

The Washington Eye is an independent news platform founded on a clear mission: to bring truth to light with courage, context, and credibility. We are not just another media outlet — Washington Eye is a sharp, bold vision for modern journalism in a noisy world.

We believe that news should inform, not manipulate. That stories should go deeper than headlines. And that journalism must serve the public, not power.


What We Stand For

🔹 Independent Reporting
The Washington Eye is free from corporate influence and political bias. Our loyalty is to truth and to the readers who seek it.

🔹 Global & U.S. Coverage
From the heart of Washington D.C. to global conflict zones, our reporting spans across politics, economics, social justice, and human stories.

🔹 Critical Thinking
We challenge narratives. We fact-check everything. We ask the hard questions others avoid.


What You’ll Find on Washington Eye:

  • Politics: Deep analysis of U.S. government, policy, and elections.
  • World News: Geopolitical developments and global affairs.
  • Business: Markets, money, and the changing economy.
  • Opinion: Thought-provoking insights from independent voices.
  • U.S. Focus: Stories that matter to Americans, from coast to coast.

A Platform with Purpose

The Washington Eye exists to empower citizens through accurate information and fearless storytelling. We’re here to shed light — not add to the noise.

Whether you’re a reader, contributor, or simply curious, you’re welcome to be part of a news movement that values clarity, truth, and depth.


Washington Eye — Journalism That Sees Through the Noise.

Continue Reading

Business

From Barter to Bitcoin: The Journey and Future of Currency

Currency is trust, coordination, and stability; without it, society and global trade collapse rapidly

Published

on

Currency is trust, coordination, and stability; without it, society and global trade collapse rapidly


by: The Washington Eye
Currency is one of the most significant inventions in human history, yet many of us overlook its importance in our daily lives. At first glance, money seems simple—coins in your pocket, bills in your wallet, or digital numbers in a bank app. But beneath its surface lies a complex system of trust, governance, and economic coordination. Currency works because people believe it works. It is not just a tool for buying and selling; it is a shared agreement among individuals and institutions that a certain object—whether paper, metal, or digital code—holds value and can be exchanged for goods and services.

Before currency came into existence, human societies relied on the barter system. In barter, people exchanged goods and services directly. This method, while natural in small communities, had major limitations. It required a double coincidence of wants: both parties had to want what the other had. If you had wheat and wanted shoes, but the shoemaker didn’t want wheat, you couldn’t trade. Currency solved this problem by serving as a universally accepted medium of exchange. Early currencies included commodities like salt, cattle, or gold—items considered valuable and difficult to fake. Eventually, these evolved into coinage and paper money, often backed by physical commodities such as gold and silver. In modern times, we use fiat money, which has no intrinsic value but is declared legal tender by governments and accepted because people trust the system behind it.

Today, central banks and financial institutions manage currency through complex tools like interest rates, inflation targeting, and money supply regulation. When handled well, these tools can stabilize the economy, foster investment, and generate employment. But mismanagement—such as excessive money printing—can lead to disastrous consequences, including hyperinflation. Historical examples like Zimbabwe or Venezuela demonstrate how quickly a currency can become worthless when public trust is lost. Without faith in currency, prices skyrocket, savings vanish, and economies collapse.

Now imagine a world without currency. Would we return to barter? Perhaps, but that would bring back the same inefficiencies that currency was invented to solve. More likely, alternative systems would emerge. These could include commodity money like gold or oil, decentralized digital currencies such as Bitcoin, or even systems of social credit or labor exchange. Each of these, however, has its flaws. Cryptocurrency, for example, promises decentralization but remains volatile and vulnerable to speculation. Commodity money might favor nations rich in resources and deepen inequality. Social credit systems, while potentially fair, could also become tools of control and surveillance.

A world without currency would likely cause global trade to collapse. Currency provides a common unit of account that allows us to price goods, calculate profits, and manage contracts. Without it, international transactions would become chaotic. Supply chains would stall, and financial markets would lose their foundations. Moreover, debt and long-term contracts rely on stable money. Without currency, these agreements lose meaning. Lending would slow down, investments would halt, and the global economy would become stagnant.

Some idealists imagine a future where money is no longer needed—where technology, automation, and abundance make everything freely accessible. In such a society, resources could be distributed based on need rather than ability to pay. This vision, promoted by movements like The Venus Project, presents a post-currency economy guided by logic and sustainability. But achieving this would require more than technological advancement. It would demand a radical transformation in human behavior, moving from competition to cooperation, and from ownership to shared access. Such a shift, while theoretically possible, is not likely in the near future.

Ultimately, the question is not whether we can eliminate currency, but how we can use it more equitably. As the world becomes increasingly digital, currencies will continue to evolve—through blockchain, central bank digital currencies, and global financial reforms. But the fundamental role of currency as a tool for coordination and trust will remain. Rather than dreaming of a currency-free utopia, our focus should be on building systems that make currency work for everyone, not just the privileged few. Currency is not just about money; it is about meaning, fairness, and the structure of our economic lives. Without it, society as we know it would unravel.

Currency is trust, coordination, and stability; without it, society and global trade collapse rapidly
Currency is trust coordination and stability without it society and global trade collapse rapidly
Continue Reading

Opinion

The Middle East Bermuda Triangle for Peace and Security

Middle East stability requires KSA-USA-Israel alliance, countering Iran and China, ensuring regional peace

Published

on

Middle East stability requires KSA-USA-Israel alliance, countering Iran and China, ensuring regional peace

The decades of wars and tensions in the Middle East have reached a point of no return and any ceasefire will not cut the deal for peace and stability in the region.  Which is a requirement for the New Middle East and a New World Order by 2030.  Therefore, the scenarios of the geopolitics of the region are no longer a classic one with Iran as the “Torch” holder of hegemon.  The aging and decaying system of Iran exemplified by the so-called Ayatullah Khamenei the Supreme Leader, becomes irrelevant in a futuristic worldview. 

A system based on false theology, or an apocalyptic mission, will only serve as the axis of evil.  Such mission was rapidly spreading in the last few years by a movement called “Shiatization” of the world, which is basically a global movement aims to manipulate youth around the world to become paramilitary soldiers implementing a prophecy of the resurrection or “the reappearance” of the 12th Imam Mohammed Al Mahdi a descendent of the Prophet Mohammed according to the Shia sect of Islam.  It is important to note that based on this myth; a false claim the Quran does support; the Shiatization movement has a significant role of destruction and in creation of a total dystopia as a pre-requisite condition for “the reappearance” to happen.  

Therefore, the Middle East and particularly the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) have stepped in as a prominent power in the region with a clear vision of 2030 for the Middle East.  The KSA under the Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS) have taken bold steps to strengthen the relationship with the United States with President Trump in Office.  The two leaders of a vastly different worlds and backgrounds, have significant and noticeable friendship as business men and Heads of States.  The world witnessed the success of the Saudi-American Economic Forum in Riyad in May 2025, and massive investments for years to come.  Granting the sanctions lift of Syria and allowing its new leadership to have a chance to stabilize Syria and save the lives of millions of the Syrian people, meant a lot for MBS and showed confidence in his regional leadership.  Same goes with the other Gulf Countries during President Trump’s visit to the region to ensure that Arabs are solid allies to the United States of America.  What is remarkable about Trump and MBS, is that both share the undeniable prospect of the Middle East once it has peace and stability in place.  The 2030 vision of the Crown Prince MBS is that eliminating the Iranian/IRGC intrusive violent interference of the proxies in Iraq, Syria (under Assad), Lebanon with Hezbollah, Houthis in Yemen and Hamas in Gaza.  Only then, the alliance of Arab nations could enter into real peace agreements with Israel. 

Furthermore, the U.S.-Israel relationship will also need to step up given the decades of alliance and ironclad ties, Israel, cannot live in isolation from its regional neighbors.  Thus, a Bermuda Triangle must be secured as KSA-USA-Israel.  The US as the trusted ally to both countries, and Trump as a trustworthy leader to both MBS and Benjamin Netanyahu.  Both who might seem rivalries, they are in fact have more in common including a core value of peace and security in the region.  The tactics or approaches might differ significantly, but that can be addressed through soft-diplomacy the trademark of KSA, not the arm twisting, but rather building on common grounds.  For instance, both leaders count on the peoples in the region, Arab Muslims, Kurds, Druz, Christians, Jews, Persians, Bloshs, Azaris, and many other ethnic and religious minority groups.  Both leaders want to establish and secure economic prosperity and wealth of resources including sustainable energy resources and agriculture.  Therefore, if President Trump could bring KSA and Israel to the negotiation table with realistic expectation rather than selling new maps, the future of the region would very well be worth every effort for peace. 

Finally, how Middle East Bermuda Triangle effect the United States? i.e. what is the Return of Investment for the America First and Make America Great Again?  The wealthy region will be entirely a strong ally to the US, not only economically, but also in every industry concerns the American superiority such as the energy, minerals, trades, water passages, and overall presence.  The Middle East peace and security or as I call it the “Bermuda Triangle” will be a massive buffer zone against China which is creeping into Africa using Iran as its proxy which is actively spreading the Shiatization movement that entails more terrorists’ organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, and the militias in Iraq.  The alliance between Iran and Egypt and Algeria is not for bilateral diplomatic relations, but rather a destruction power to threaten Israel and to sabotage the West Sahara Desert Agreement with Morocco. China through Iran will increase their exploitation to African countries to ensure destabilization and attacks on U.S. interests in the continent.   In addition, the China-Iran alliance have funded operations, based on open-source intelligence reports, to reach American soil by exploiting open border policy of the Biden Administration, and have established training and grooming camps in Cuba and Venezuela. 

In conclusion, the Bermuda Triangle Peace and Security of the Middle East through the U.S., the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Israel is a necessity for world peace and security; by forcing the Islamic Republic of Iran to hand down its torch of hegemon by Peace through Strength Policy of the U.S. of the Trump Administration.  The power of KSA and Israel together will hold the fragile region together and build it up from ruins.  The KSA legitimately can unite the Arab countries for peace and stability without leaving Israel in isolation.  While the U.S. will have a greater presence with solidified allies and partners to counter the greater global threat of China and its proxy of Iran. 

Middle East stability requires KSA-USA-Israel alliance, countering Iran and China, ensuring regional peace
Middle East stability requires KSA USA Israel alliance countering Iran and China ensuring regional peace
Continue Reading

Trending