Entertainment
Beyond Hollywood: The Grit and Tragedy of The Great Escape
The Great Escape was a daring WWII prison break, marked by ingenuity, bravery, and tragedy

In a BBC Culture feature written by Nicholas Barber, the harrowing true story behind the infamous World War II breakout known as “The Great Escape” is revisited with fresh insight and firsthand testimony. Barber recounts how the operation, brought to life in the 1963 film of the same name, was in reality a meticulously planned, year-long effort involving covert tunnel construction, document forgery, and psychological endurance.
The Planning: Ambition in Captivity
The escape was conceived more than a year prior, driven by Squadron Leader Roger Bushell, a veteran escape artist. Known as “Big X,” Bushell envisioned not just a breakout, but a strategic blow against German resources. His plan aimed to have 200 men escape, knowing it would force the Germans to divert massive personnel to track them down. He proposed digging three tunnels—Tom, Dick, and Harry—simultaneously. The logic was simple but brilliant: if the Germans discovered one, they might not suspect the others. The mere mention of the word “tunnel” was forbidden; Bushell even threatened court-martial for those who broke the code.
Even before the camp was built, prisoners had gained intelligence by volunteering to help with construction, allowing them to map out future escape routes. The site itself—Stalag Luft III—was chosen by the Germans specifically to deter escape. Built on yellow sandy subsoil that would reveal tunneling, surrounded by double barbed-wire fences and guard towers every 100 yards, and outfitted with buried microphones to detect sound, the camp was a fortress, yet the prisoners were determined.
Tunnel Engineering: Genius Under Pressure
Despite the camp’s defenses, the POWs’ ingenuity knew no bounds. Each tunnel required ventilation, lighting, structural support, and the safe disposal of soil. An air pump, cobbled together from kitbags and wood, supplied air via piping made from emptied Red Cross milk tins. Lights ran through cables stolen and repurposed from the camp’s systems. The real stroke of brilliance was in how the soil was discarded: prisoners fashioned “dispersal bags” out of long underwear, worn under their trousers. They would discreetly dump sand while walking in the yard, kicking it into the ground as they moved.
Forging documents was another monumental task. Ley Kenyon, one of the lead forgers, recounted how a printing press was created using hand-carved rubber letters—crafted from cobbler’s heels and bits of wood. The effort was extraordinary: between 7,000 and 8,000 counterfeit papers were created, ranging from identity cards to train tickets. A smuggled camera was used for photos, and bribes were used to gain access to real documents for replication. Every escapee needed civilian clothes, a backstory, travel papers, and a compass—each item a potential life-saver or a death sentence if it failed inspection.
The Escape: March 24, 1944
By winter 1943, tunnel “Harry” was completed and sealed, awaiting favorable conditions. On March 24, 1944, 220 men were selected. But the escape hit immediate snags. The tunnel came up short of the tree line, forcing escapees to crawl out in full view of guard towers. Additionally, the entrance trapdoor froze shut in the cold. Despite these obstacles, 76 men managed to crawl out before a guard spotted the 77th and raised the alarm.
The aim wasn’t merely freedom—it was disruption. The men understood that most would be recaptured, but hoped their efforts would scatter German resources. Paul Brickhill, who chronicled the events in his 1950 book The Great Escape, estimated that up to five million Germans were mobilized in the search. Ultimately, only three men evaded capture: two reached Sweden, and one made it to Spain.
The Tragic Aftermath: Hitler’s Retaliation
Enraged, Hitler initially ordered all 73 recaptured escapees executed. Though his advisors persuaded him to reduce the number, he still insisted that 50 be shot as a deterrent. This act—carried out deceitfully—was a clear violation of international law. Rather than being executed en masse as depicted in the film, the men were taken in small groups under the pretense of being returned to camp, then shot on isolated roadsides. Their remains were cremated, and the cause of death falsely attributed to escape attempts or resistance. As Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden later stated, the only explanation for cremation was to conceal the manner of death.
Among those killed was Roger Bushell. Shot in the back alongside his partner by the Gestapo, Bushell’s ashes were returned to camp, but his remains were lost during the chaos of advancing Allied troops. Survivors like Sydney Dowse and Jimmy James expressed disbelief that they weren’t executed themselves, calling their survival “just luck. And… pretty terrible”.
Justice and Historical Memory
The UK government was swift in its condemnation. Eden told Parliament in June 1944 that those responsible would be hunted down and brought to justice. Post-war investigations confirmed the planned executions, and 13 Gestapo officers were hanged for their roles. Yet the story could have faded without the work of Brickhill, whose book and its subsequent film adaptation kept the escape alive in public consciousness.
Survivor Charles Clarke, who had helped with the escape as a lookout, emphasized the importance of remembrance. “Without the film,” he said, “who would remember what a magnificent achievement it was?”.
A Final Note
Though the true story of the Great Escape is steeped in tragedy, it endures as a powerful testament to resilience, cooperation, and the unyielding pursuit of freedom. Through Nicholas Barber’s detailed recounting on BBC Culture, the operation emerges not as a romanticized caper, but as a stark reminder of the cost of war and the courage of those who resisted from behind barbed wire. The prisoners of Stalag Luft III were not just escapees—they were engineers, forgers, saboteurs, and survivors who turned captivity into quiet rebellion.
Celebs
Ground Control to Katy Perry: The Internet Isn’t Impressed
Katy Perry’s spaceflight sparks backlash as critics question celebrity privilege and performative symbolism

On 14 April 2025, Blue Origin’s New Shepard NS-31 mission lifted off from Corn Ranch in West Texas, marking what many hailed as a historic moment: the first all-female crewed mission to space since Valentina Tereshkova’s groundbreaking solo flight in 1963. But amid the celebration, the mission has also sparked debate over the true accessibility and purpose of commercial space travel in the modern era.
The suborbital flight, lasting approximately 10 minutes and 21 seconds, carried six women aboard—a diverse group comprising former NASA aerospace engineer Aisha Bowe, civil rights activist Amanda Nguyen, journalist Gayle King, pop superstar Katy Perry, film producer Kerianne Flynn, and pilot and broadcaster Lauren Sánchez, who is also the mission’s curator. The spacecraft soared beyond the Kármán line—106 kilometres above Earth—offering the crew a few weightless minutes before descending safely back to Earth under parachutes.
Each crew member brought with her a distinct narrative. Bowe became the first Bahamian in space; Nguyen, a Nobel Peace Prize nominee and advocate for sexual violence survivors, made history as the first Vietnamese-American woman in space. King overcame her well-documented fear of flying, Perry brought international celebrity attention to the launch, Flynn championed the role of women in film and storytelling, and Sánchez leveraged her aviation experience to coordinate the mission’s message of empowerment.
Once weightless, the crew declared, “Take up space,” as a unifying slogan, with Perry serenading the cabin with “What a Wonderful World.” Their flight was attended by a host of celebrities, including Oprah Winfrey, who celebrated King’s participation, and Orlando Bloom, Perry’s partner.
What Did This Mission Really Accomplish?
While Blue Origin lauded the flight as a milestone for representation and inspiration, critics have questioned its actual significance. Unlike orbital missions that conduct scientific experiments or contribute to space station logistics, NS-31 was purely touristic—lasting barely over ten minutes. The mission did not carry research payloads, technological tests, or humanitarian goals beyond symbolism.
For some, the symbolism is meaningful—showcasing diverse women in a domain long dominated by men. For others, it’s a reminder that space, at least for now, remains the playground of the ultra-wealthy. With tickets costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, the average citizen is far from “taking up space” in any literal sense. Even among private citizens who’ve travelled to space, most come from elite circles of wealth, influence, or celebrity.
Backlash and “Tone-Deaf” Optics
The presence of Katy Perry on the mission drew particular scrutiny—not only because of her fame, but due to a post-flight moment that quickly went viral. Upon exiting the capsule, Perry was seen kissing the ground. While intended to be a gesture of gratitude, it was widely criticised online as performative and out of touch. Many on social media argued that her behaviour trivialised the accomplishment and reflected a lack of awareness of broader global issues, including poverty, war, and climate crises.
Actress Olivia Munn added to the critique, calling the mission “indulgent” and “tone-deaf” given the world’s current struggles. She questioned whether such ventures truly serve humanity or merely stroke the egos of those wealthy enough to afford a seat.
The controversy surrounding Perry also reignited debates about the optics of celebrities participating in what are framed as inspirational missions. While the intention may be to democratise space, the reality—obvious to many observers—is that access remains limited to those with the right bank account or connections.
A Step Forward or a Missed Opportunity?
Despite the criticism, the NS-31 mission remains notable for its emphasis on gender representation and public visibility. It proved that female-led missions can capture global attention and inspire a new generation of space enthusiasts. But whether that inspiration translates into real progress toward inclusive access to space remains to be seen.
For now, missions like NS-31 exist in a grey zone—caught between progress and privilege. While they undeniably advance the visibility of women in spaceflight, they also highlight the economic exclusivity still inherent in the sector. Until tickets are accessible to scientists, educators, and citizens without celebrity or corporate backing, the dream of universal space travel remains aspirational, not actual.
As Blue Origin prepares for its next flight, the world will be watching—both to see who gets to go, and what they choose to do with their moment among the stars.
Arts
Shaken, Not Stirred: Inside Amazon’s Bold Entertainment Power Play
Amazon reshapes entertainment with MGM overhaul, Bond takeover, and Salke’s exit for new venture

Amazon’s acquisition of MGM in 2022 marked a significant shift in the entertainment industry, and recent developments indicate that this integration is leading to substantial changes within Amazon MGM Studios.
On March 27, 2025, Jennifer Salke, the head of Amazon MGM Studios, announced her departure to establish a new production entity. Salke, who joined Amazon in 2018 after serving as president of NBC Entertainment, played a pivotal role in developing successful projects such as “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.” Her exit aligns with Amazon’s strategy to streamline decision-making processes within the studio. Following her departure, Courtenay Valenti (head of film) and Vernon Sanders (head of TV) will report directly to Mike Hopkins, head of Prime Video and Amazon MGM Studios. Salke has also secured a first-look deal with Amazon MGM Studios for her new venture.
In a move that underscores Amazon’s commitment to revitalizing its newly acquired assets, the company has taken creative control of the James Bond franchise. Longtime producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, who have overseen the series for over six decades, have ceded their creative control to Amazon MGM Studios. This transition marks a significant change in the stewardship of the iconic spy series.
To spearhead the next chapter of James Bond, Amazon has appointed seasoned Hollywood producers Amy Pascal and David Heyman. Pascal is renowned for her work on Sony’s “Spider-Man” franchise, while Heyman has been instrumental in producing the “Harry Potter” and “Paddington” films. Their combined expertise is expected to bring a fresh perspective to the Bond series, with discussions already underway regarding the casting of a new actor for the titular role.
These developments reflect Amazon’s broader strategy to integrate MGM’s rich content library into its ecosystem, enhancing its competitive edge in the streaming market. By taking creative control of flagship franchises like James Bond and restructuring its studio leadership, Amazon aims to streamline operations and foster innovation in content creation.
However, these changes also raise questions about the future direction of beloved franchises and the balance between honoring legacy content and pursuing new creative visions. Fans and industry observers will be keenly watching how Amazon navigates these challenges in the evolving entertainment landscape.

Arts
From Aladdin to Iron Man and Coca-Cola: Unraveling Orientalism in Western Media
Western films and advertisements have portrayed a racist view of the East, presenting it as “the other” that cannot be equal to the West.

In his book “Orientalism”, Palestinian literary scholar Edward Said explained Orientalism as the belief in Western superiority over the East. This belief is perpetuated by Western society as a foundation for creating theories, narratives, social descriptions, and political assessments about the East—its people, customs, mentality, and destiny. Western societies, through this philosophy, promote the idea that Arab communities are savage, uncivilized, and pose a threat to the West.
Said pointed out that Orientalism began during the European Enlightenment and the colonization of the Arab world. It provided justification for European colonialism based on the notion that the East was fundamentally different and inferior, thus requiring Western intervention or “rescue.” Given that art plays a significant role in spreading cultures, ideas, and ideologies, the West has long used films and songs to reinforce stereotypes and propagate Orientalist culture.
Western films and advertisements have portrayed a racist view of the East, presenting it as “the other” that cannot be equal to the West. These media types often depict Arabs as terrorists or tyrants, portray Arab women as either terrorists or sexual objects, and present veiled and niqab-wearing women as oppressed and submissive.
Orientalism in the Silver Screen
Disney’s Aladdin (1992)
The song “Arabian Nights” from the Aladdin soundtrack describes the protagonist’s homeland as a place where “they’ll cut off your ear if they don’t like your face,” depicting it as barbaric but still “home.” After backlash regarding the lyrics, the song was altered in the 2019 remake, removing the offensive line.
Iron Man Series – 2013
In the first Iron Man film, actor Faran Tahir challenged the Islamophobic narrative by changing the portrayal of the kidnappers of Tony Stark from a group of Muslim terrorists to a band of international mercenaries. However, in Iron Man 3, the storyline shifted focus to a terrorist threat named “The Mandarin” based in Pakistan. The scene depicted a group of veiled women working in a sewing factory, and Iron Patriot remarks, “Yes, you’re free, if you weren’t before… No need to thank me.” Yet one of these veiled women turns out to be a terrorist hiding her identity under the veil, reinforcing negative stereotypes about Muslim women as both oppressed and dangerous.
American Assassin (2017)
Described by author Opheli Lawler as “ a film that pairs American exceptionalism with American imperialism masked as spreading democracy”, American Assassin is about a young CIA agent seeking revenge after his loved ones are killed by terrorists. It portrays Arabs as the primary source of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, thus promoting “Islamophobia” (fear or prejudice against Islam and Muslims, especially as a political force).
Positive Representations in Hollywood
While most films with Arab elements promote Orientalist views, a few exceptions present more realistic portrayals of the Arab world. Kingdom of Heaven provided an accurate historical context of Jerusalem, and Victoria and Abdul conveyed a humanitarian message without bias.
Commercializing Stereotypes
IKEA’s 2012 Saudi Arabian Catalog:
In 2012, IKEA faced criticism for removing images of women from its Saudi Arabian catalog. The same scenes in international versions included women, highlighting a significant alteration for the Saudi market. The images below shows a side-by-side comparison of the international catalog (left) featuring a woman, and the Saudi Arabian version (right) where the woman has been removed.
Coca-Cola’s 2013 Super Bowl Advertisement
Coca-Cola’s 2013 Super Bowl ad employs orientalist imagery by featuring an Arab man dressed in traditional attire leading a camel through the desert. This portrayal relies on outdated and stereotypical visuals of the Middle East as a barren, timeless landscape inhabited by mysterious and primitive figures. The ad’s depiction reduces Middle Eastern identity to a simplistic and exoticized trope, ignoring the modernity and diversity of the region.
Final Remarks
In examining these films and advertisements through the lens of Orientalism, it becomes evident how media continues to shape—and often distort—our perceptions of the Arab world. While some works are now beginning to reject outdated tropes and offer more nuanced perspectives, the entrenched stereotypes remain pervasive. Challenging these portrayals and advocating for authenticity is crucial for dismantling Orientalist narratives and embracing a more inclusive global culture.
-
Opinion2 months ago
How I Spent My Week: Roasting Musk, Martian ICE, and Government Absurdities
-
Business3 months ago
Why Are Planes Falling from the Sky?
-
Politics4 months ago
Comrade Workwear Unveils ‘Most Wanted CEO’ Playing Cards Amidst Controversy
-
Opinion4 months ago
From Le Pen to Trump: The Far-Right Legacy Behind a Presidential Comeback
-
Opinion2 months ago
Oval Office Chaos: How Trump and Zelensky’s Meeting Went Off the Rails
-
Opinion4 months ago
2025: The Turning Point in Global Power and Security
-
Opinion2 months ago
The UAE’s Growing Role in Russia-Ukraine Peace Negotiations
-
Business3 weeks ago
Trump’s ‘Gold Card’ Visa: Citizenship for Sale at $5 Million a Piece