Connect with us

Business

Blackwater Redux: The Shocking Proposal to Outsource U.S. Deportations

Private military contractors shift from war zones to domestic enforcement, raising legal and ethical concerns

Published

on

Deportation for Profit? The Dangerous Shift Toward Private Military Contractor

The role of private military contractors (PMCs) has historically been associated with war zones, security operations, and intelligence work. However, the latest reports indicating that Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, has proposed using PMCs for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants in the United States raises significant questions about the evolving role of these entities.

This proposal—reportedly considered by former President Donald Trump—suggests outsourcing immigration enforcement to private forces, a move that would mark a major shift in U.S. immigration policy.

But is this the first time private contractors have been used in such a role? A look at historical precedents suggests otherwise.


The Role of Private Military Contractors in History

PMCs have long been employed by states for functions that were traditionally handled by government forces. These companies are not merely mercenary outfits but are legally registered entities operating in various capacities worldwide, often at the behest of governments or corporations. The historical use of PMCs extends beyond combat and has included policing, border security, and other governmental functions.

1. The British East India Company (1600-1874): A Private Military in Colonial Administration

One of the earliest large-scale examples of private forces acting in a governmental capacity was the British East India Company. This corporation controlled vast territories and maintained a private army that at its peak outnumbered the British Army itself. The company played a role not just in military conquest but also in governance, law enforcement, and customs enforcement, effectively acting as a quasi-state entity. The use of private forces to control populations and enforce policies was a direct forerunner to modern PMCs being employed in unconventional roles.

2. The Pinkerton National Detective Agency (1850s-1930s): Private Enforcement in the U.S.

Advertisement

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the U.S. government and private businesses frequently employed the Pinkerton National Detective Agency to conduct security operations, strike-breaking, and surveillance. The agency was often used in roles that blurred the line between private and public law enforcement, including mass arrests and deportations of labor organizers and immigrant workers during times of unrest. This period demonstrated that private security forces could be used to control and manage populations in ways that were often legally dubious but politically expedient.

3. The French Foreign Legion and Mercenary Forces in Africa (1950s-1970s)

Although not a private company, the French Foreign Legion functioned in ways similar to modern PMCs, enforcing colonial rule and stabilizing regions to serve French geopolitical interests. Private mercenary outfits such as those led by Bob Denard and Jean Schramme operated extensively in Africa, conducting government-backed deportations, forced relocations, and population control in former colonies such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Angola. These mercenaries often acted as de facto immigration enforcement agents, removing or displacing populations deemed a threat to European interests.

4. South Africa’s Executive Outcomes (1990s): Private Armies in Conflict and Security Roles

One of the most well-known PMCs of the modern era, Executive Outcomes, operated in Angola and Sierra Leone, stabilizing governments and enforcing order in regions affected by civil war. Though primarily involved in combat operations, PMCs like Executive Outcomes have also been contracted for border security and law enforcement roles, demonstrating the willingness of governments to privatize functions related to population control.

5. Blackwater’s Role in Iraq and Afghanistan (2000s): A Precedent for Expanding PMC Authority

Erik Prince’s Blackwater became infamous for its operations in Iraq, where it provided security for U.S. diplomats and carried out paramilitary operations. However, the company also played a role in detention, intelligence gathering, and border security, highlighting its ability to function in non-traditional military roles. This paved the way for considering PMCs for domestic enforcement functions, such as the recent proposal for deportation operations.


Has This Been Done Before?

Advertisement

While the specific use of PMCs for deportations in the U.S. would be unprecedented, historical precedents exist for using private forces in similar roles. Several examples illustrate how private entities have been involved in immigration control and population removals in various contexts:

  • United States – GEO Group and CoreCivic: These companies operate private immigration detention centers under contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), playing a major role in detaining and processing undocumented immigrants. While they do not directly conduct deportations, their involvement demonstrates how immigration enforcement has already been partially privatized.
  • Israel – Modi’in Ezrachi and Shahar Security: Private security firms have been contracted by the Israeli government to assist with border security, detaining individuals deemed security risks, and managing checkpoints in the West Bank.
  • Australia – Serco: The Australian government contracts Serco to operate offshore immigration detention centers, handling detainee processing, security, and in some cases, deportation logistics.
  • European Union – Frontex Private Contractors: The EU has worked with private security firms to monitor migration routes, assist in border security, and detain individuals before deportation, particularly in the Mediterranean and North African regions.

Potential Legal and Ethical Issues

The legal framework surrounding immigration enforcement in the United States mandates that only government agencies, such as ICE, have the authority to carry out deportations. If PMCs are contracted for this role, there could be significant legal challenges regarding their authority and oversight. The use of private contractors may allow the government to circumvent existing due process protections for undocumented immigrants, potentially leading to violations of U.S. and international human rights laws.

Accountability is another major concern. Unlike government agencies, PMCs operate with fewer transparency requirements. If abuses occur during deportations, holding these contractors accountable may prove difficult. Given Blackwater’s controversial history—including the 2007 Nisour Square massacre in Iraq—there are legitimate concerns that using private forces in immigration enforcement could lead to excessive force or human rights violations.

The use of force by private contractors is a significant risk. PMCs are typically trained for combat and security operations rather than immigration enforcement. Deploying personnel with military or paramilitary backgrounds to remove individuals from their homes or workplaces could result in violent confrontations, further fueling public outcry. Additionally, private contractors may not be bound by the same de-escalation policies that government immigration officers must follow.

From a political and public relations standpoint, outsourcing deportations to PMCs could provoke strong opposition both domestically and internationally. The optics of private forces conducting mass deportations—especially under a company with Blackwater’s reputation—would likely generate widespread criticism and legal challenges. Human rights organizations, advocacy groups, and even international allies of the United States may view such a move as a dangerous escalation of immigration enforcement tactics.

Finally, the economic implications of such a plan raise questions about government spending and cost-effectiveness. Hiring PMCs is expensive, and past contracts with private security firms have often been plagued by allegations of financial mismanagement and corruption. If deportation operations are outsourced, taxpayers could end up footing a significantly higher bill than if enforcement remained within government agencies.


Conclusion: A Dangerous Precedent?

The potential use of PMCs for deportations would represent a major expansion of their role, blurring the lines between military operations and domestic law enforcement. While this is not the first time private forces have been used to manage populations, it would mark a significant departure in U.S. policy. Given the historical precedents, it is clear that governments have turned to private entities for similar functions in the past—but the risks and controversies surrounding such actions remain significant.

Advertisement

Whether or not this proposal moves forward, it signals a broader shift toward the increasing privatization of government functions, raising questions about the future role of PMCs in domestic security and law enforcement.

Blackwater Redux: The Shocking Proposal to Outsource U.S. Deportations
Mercenaries at the Border The Privatization of US Deportation Efforts

Business

DHL Halts High-Value U.S. Shipments, Shaking Global Trade and Luxury Brands

DHL suspends high-value B2C shipments to U.S., disrupting global trade and luxury exports significantly

Published

on

DHL suspends high-value B2C shipments to U.S., disrupting global trade and luxury exports significantly

Global logistics leader DHL has announced a temporary suspension of business-to-consumer (B2C) shipments to the United States for packages valued over $800. This decision, effective from April 21, 2025, comes in response to recent changes in U.S. customs regulations that have significantly increased the complexity and processing time for higher-value imports.

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) recently lowered the threshold for mandatory formal entry processing from $2,500 to $800, effective April 5. This change requires more detailed documentation for shipments exceeding the new threshold, leading to substantial delays and increased workload for customs clearance processes. DHL cited these challenges as the primary reason for the suspension, stating that the surge in formal customs clearances has overwhelmed their systems, causing multi-day transit delays for affected shipments .

While B2C shipments over $800 are suspended, business-to-business (B2B) shipments of similar value will continue, albeit with potential delays due to the heightened scrutiny and paperwork requirements. Shipments valued under $800 remain unaffected by this suspension.

The suspension has sent ripples through international markets, particularly affecting exporters who rely heavily on U.S. consumers. British luxury brands, for instance, have expressed significant concern. Companies like Joseph Cheaney & Sons and Sabina Savage, which derive a substantial portion of their sales from the U.S., are facing logistical nightmares. Sabina Savage noted that 90% of her customers are based in the U.S., and the suspension has led to additional costs and challenges in fulfilling orders .

Trade bodies have also voiced their apprehensions. Walpole, representing British luxury brands including Burberry and Alexander McQueen, highlighted that their members are being “doubly penalised”—unable to deliver goods and subjected to a 10% tariff on those that do get through. Helen Brocklebank, Walpole’s chief executive, emphasized the financial strain this places on businesses that have built long-standing relationships with DHL and now face the daunting task of finding alternative logistics providers .

The suspension is part of a broader context of escalating trade tensions. President Donald Trump’s administration has implemented a series of tariffs aimed at reducing trade deficits, notably imposing a 145% tariff on Chinese goods. In retaliation, China has enacted a 125% tariff on U.S. products. These measures have disrupted global supply chains and increased costs for businesses and consumers alike .

Analysts warn that the growing bureaucratic strain could disrupt global e-commerce and supply chains, raising costs for U.S. consumers. The rollback of the “de minimis” exemption, which previously allowed low-cost imports to bypass duties and inspections, is expected to further impact companies that rely on shipping low-cost goods to the U.S., such as Shein and Temu .

DHL has emphasized that the suspension is a temporary measure and that they are working diligently to manage the increased workload caused by the new customs regulations. The company has not provided a specific timeline for when the suspension will be lifted but has promised to share updates as the situation evolves .

Advertisement

In the meantime, businesses affected by the suspension are exploring alternative logistics providers, though many have expressed concerns about the costs and complexities involved in transitioning from established relationships with DHL. The situation underscores the broader economic fallout of recent trade policy changes, affecting both exporters and American consumers of international goods. As the global trade landscape continues to evolve, businesses and consumers alike will need to adapt to the changing regulatory environment and its implications for international commerce.

DHL suspends high value B2C shipments to US disrupting global trade and luxury exports significantly
Continue Reading

Business

Scams Without Borders: How Asian Crime Syndicates Went Global

Asian scam syndicates expand globally, exploiting trafficking, tech, and weak law enforcement across continents

Published

on

Asian scam syndicates expand globally, exploiting trafficking, tech, and weak law enforcement across continents

Once confined to Southeast Asia, particularly in countries like Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, scam operations orchestrated by Asian crime syndicates have now expanded their reach globally. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) reports that these operations are generating nearly $40 billion annually through various fraudulent activities, including romance scams, fake investment schemes, and illicit online gambling. This expansion is partly a response to intensified crackdowns in Southeast Asia, prompting these syndicates to relocate to regions with weaker law enforcement, such as parts of Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.

The Mechanics of Modern Scam Operations

These scam operations often involve large compounds where trafficked individuals are coerced into conducting online scams. Victims are lured with promises of legitimate employment but find themselves trapped in conditions akin to modern slavery. Their passports are confiscated, and they face threats of violence or worse if they fail to meet scam quotas. Technological advancements have further empowered these operations; the use of artificial intelligence, deepfakes, and cryptocurrencies make it easier to deceive victims and launder money, complicating efforts to trace and dismantle these networks.

Global Hotspots and Notorious Scams: Who’s Getting Hit the Hardest?

By 2025, the reach of Asian-organized scam operations has expanded far beyond their initial strongholds in Southeast Asia, now deeply affecting countries across Africa, Latin America, and parts of Europe. These syndicates are adapting quickly, exploiting regions with limited cyber enforcement capacity and regulatory oversight. Law enforcement actions in early 2025 in countries like Nigeria, Zambia, and Angola have revealed growing local footholds for scam infrastructure, often linked to trafficking networks relocating from Myanmar and Cambodia.

Latin America has also emerged as a major target zone. Brazilian authorities have reported a surge in online financial scams, many operated remotely through fraudulent crypto trading platforms linked to Southeast Asian crime syndicates. In a striking case in Peru in late 2023, authorities rescued over 40 trafficked Malaysians who had been forced to perpetrate cyber fraud under threat of violence — a scenario that’s becoming more frequent as scam centers globalize their labor sourcing.

Among the most infamous scams now circulating worldwide is the “pig butchering” scheme — a long-con tactic involving emotional manipulation and fraudulent crypto investments. The FBI reported that in 2024 alone, over 4,300 victims in the U.S. were directly affected by this scam, with global financial losses from such frauds reaching nearly $10 billion. Romance scams more broadly continue to flourish in the U.S., nearly 59,000 people lost an estimated $697.3 million in 2024, primarily through dating app and social media cons that escalated into financial exploitation.

Human Trafficking and Exploitation

A disturbing aspect of these operations is the human cost. According to the UN, at least 120,000 people in Myanmar and 100,000 in Cambodia are being held in scam compounds under duress. These individuals are often subjected to physical abuse, forced labor, and in some cases, threats of organ harvesting. The international nature of these crimes means that victims come from various countries, including Brazil, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, and Uzbekistan, highlighting the global reach and impact of these syndicates.

Challenges in Combating the Spread

Law enforcement agencies face significant hurdles in addressing this issue. The transnational nature of these crimes, coupled with the use of sophisticated technology and the exploitation of jurisdictions with weak governance, makes it difficult to coordinate effective responses. Moreover, the profitability of these operations provides little incentive for local authorities in some regions to take action. International operations like “Operation First Light 2024” have made some headway, resulting in thousands of arrests and the seizure of millions in assets. However, these efforts are often reactive and limited in scope, underscoring the need for a more proactive and coordinated global strategy.

Implications for Global Security and Economy

The proliferation of these scam operations poses a significant threat to global security and economic stability. The financial losses incurred by victims are substantial, with the United States alone reporting over $5.6 billion in losses to cryptocurrency scams in 2023. Beyond the economic impact, the human rights violations associated with these operations, including human trafficking and forced labor, represent a moral crisis that demands immediate attention. Failure to address these issues could lead to further destabilization in vulnerable regions and undermine international efforts to combat organized crime.

Advertisement

A Final Note

The expansion of Asian scam operations into a global network is a pressing issue that transcends borders and requires a unified international response. As these syndicates continue to evolve and adapt, so too must the strategies employed to dismantle them. This includes not only law enforcement actions but also efforts to address the underlying socio-economic factors that make individuals and regions susceptible to exploitation.

Asian scam syndicates expand globally exploiting trafficking tech and weak law enforcement across continents
Continue Reading

Business

The Magic Stalls: Why Disney’s Parks Are Losing Their Spark at Home

Disney’s U.S. theme parks face slowing attendance as travel costs rise and preferences shift

Published

on

Disney’s U.S. theme parks face slowing attendance as travel costs rise and preferences shift

The allure of Disney’s theme parks, long a cornerstone of American tourism, is facing challenges as a slowdown in international visitors to the U.S. impacts attendance figures. Economic factors, shifting travel preferences, and rising costs are contributing to a complex landscape for Disney’s domestic parks.

Recent reports indicate that Disney’s domestic theme parks have experienced a stagnation in attendance growth. In 2024, domestic attendance was up just 1% compared to a 6% increase in 2023. Hotel bookings remained flat at 85% occupancy, and while guest spending saw a modest uptick, the overall operating profit declined by 3%.

Hugh Johnston, Disney’s Chief Financial Officer, attributed the decline to “moderation of consumer demand,” noting that rising food and labor costs have squeezed the parks’ profitability. He also highlighted that higher-income consumers are opting for international travel, taking advantage of the strong U.S. dollar, while lower-income consumers are feeling financial pressures that deter discretionary spending on vacations.

International Travel: A Competing Attraction

The strength of the U.S. dollar has made international destinations more appealing to American travelers. Len Testa, president of the trip planning website Touring Plans, observed that families are increasingly comparing the cost of a Disney vacation to trips abroad, often finding international travel to be a more memorable and cost-effective option.

This shift is not only affecting Disney but also other theme park operators. Universal and Six Flags have reported declines in revenue and guest attendance, signaling a broader trend in the industry. The cost of a Disney vacation has risen significantly, with the average price of a one-week vacation in the U.S. for one person estimated at $1,991. A family of four looking to visit Disney World should budget several thousand dollars, making alternative vacations like cruises or European trips more competitive.

Additionally, the introduction of paid services such as Lightning Lane, replacing the once-free FastPass+, and the discontinuation of complimentary services like airport shuttle buses, have altered the value proposition for visitors. These changes, coupled with steady ticket price increases, have led some to question whether Disney has reached a “price plateau” that could deter future attendance.

Disney’s Strategic Response

Advertisement

Despite these challenges, Disney remains optimistic about the long-term prospects of its parks. The company has announced plans to invest $60 billion over the next decade to expand and enhance its theme parks and cruise lines, aiming to attract new visitors and retain loyal fans.

Disney executives acknowledge the current “demand moderation” but believe that the parks’ unique offerings and strong intellectual property portfolio will continue to draw guests. They are actively monitoring attendance and guest spending while managing costs to navigate the current economic landscape.

Looking Ahead

As the travel industry adjusts to post-pandemic realities and economic fluctuations, Disney’s theme parks face the challenge of balancing affordability with the premium experiences that guests expect. The company’s substantial investments in park enhancements signal a commitment to maintaining its position as a leading destination, even as it adapts to changing consumer behaviors and preferences. The coming years will be pivotal in determining how Disney navigates these challenges and whether it can recapture the magic that has long defined its theme park experiences.

Disney’s U.S. theme parks face slowing attendance as travel costs rise and preferences shift
Disneys US theme parks face slowing attendance as travel costs rise and preferences shift
Continue Reading

Trending