Poor Design Blamed for Titan Sub Tragedy

Hizana Khathoon
By
Hizana Khathoon
Hizana Khathoon is a freelance writer and journalist at The Washington Eye, with a background in Journalism and Psychology. She covers U.S. politics, social issues and...
US investigators say OceanGate’s Titan sub imploded due to poor design, ignored warnings, and untested materials—making the 2023 disaster preventable.

According to a shocking new study from US investigators, the fatal implosion of OceanGate’s Titan submersible during its 2023 voyage to the Titanic wreckage was caused by poor engineering and a failure to adequately test the craft.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that the company’s design process was “inadequate” and did not meet basic strength and durability requirements. The 22-foot submarine imploded in the North Atlantic on June 18, 2023, killing all five individuals on board, including OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush.

Ignored Warnings and Unverified Design

According to the NTSB, OceanGate failed to undertake adequate testing to verify Titan’s true pressure resistance, implying that it was effectively descending blind into the deep ocean. The carbon-fiber hull, once hailed as a beacon of innovation, was never certified to such deep depths.

Investigators discovered that the business had overlooked signs of past structural deterioration that should have grounded the vessel before its fatal journey. “Because OceanGate failed to verify Titan’s strength, it did not realize the submersible was compromised and unsafe for operation,” according to the investigation.

The submarine vanished around 372 miles off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada, as it attempted to approach the Titanic ruins nearly 13,000 feet beneath the ocean.

A “Preventable” Disaster

The results follow a previous study by the United States Coast Guard, which termed the tragedy “entirely preventable” and criticized OceanGate’s “critically flawed safety culture.”

Stockton Rush, the pilot who flew the fateful dive, had long criticized established certification requirements, claiming they impeded innovation. His approach is now at the heart of the disaster.

On board were four paying passengers: British billionaire Hamish Harding, Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, his 19-year-old son Suleman, and renowned Titanic specialist Paul-Henri Nargeolet. Each paid up to $250,000 for what was described as a “once-in-a-lifetime expedition.”

Safety Concerns Ignored

The NTSB investigation featured testimony from OceanGate workers who depicted a fractured corporate culture. Some stated that safety was “always the top priority,” while others alleged important warnings were consistently ignored.

A former director of marine operations told investigators he was sacked for citing design issues. Another technician expressed concern about the company’s habit of referring to paying clients as “mission specialists” – a rebranding intended to avoid restrictions barring passenger transport in experimental submersibles.

When the technician expressed legal worries, Rush reportedly said that if the US Coast Guard “became a problem,” he would “buy himself a congressman” to solve it.

Legacy of Risk and Negligence

The Titan catastrophe sparked international anger and brought about new concerns about private exploration in severe regions. The NTSB findings highlight the consequences of taking corners in the sake of innovation.

“The Titanic tragedy was not an accident,” one official stated. “It was a chain of deliberate decisions that ignored engineering principles and basic safety.”

As rescue teams continue to examine wreckage from the implosion, experts think Titan’s lessons could affect future restrictions for deep-sea research, a field where ambition has reached a catastrophic limit.

Share This Article
Follow:
Hizana Khathoon is a freelance writer and journalist at The Washington Eye, with a background in Journalism and Psychology. She covers U.S. politics, social issues and human-interest stories with a deep commitment to thoughtful storytelling. In addition to reporting, she likes to manage social media platforms and craft digital strategies to engage and grow online audiences.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *