Celebs
When Private Meets Public: The Slap That Shook the Presidency
Viral video of Brigitte Macron slapping husband sparks global debate on gender and optics

The world was left stunned last week after a video went viral showing French President Emmanuel Macron appearing to be slapped—or at least abruptly pushed in the face—by his wife, Brigitte Macron, upon their arrival in Vietnam on May 27, 2025.
The footage, captured as the presidential couple disembarked from their plane in Hanoi, spread rapidly across social media platforms and news outlets, triggering a wave of global reactions. Initially dismissed as fake by the Elysée Palace, the video was later confirmed to be authentic. A presidential spokesperson described the incident as a “private, affectionate interaction” and said the couple was simply “decompressing” after a long flight.
President Macron later addressed the matter himself, calling the reaction “nonsense” and accusing the media of sensationalizing trivial moments while ignoring more pressing global issues. Still, the video touched a nerve. Public discussion over the past week has intensified, with many questioning the nature of the interaction and the implications it carries.
The incident has reignited debates around gender dynamics and domestic violence double standards. Critics argue that if the roles had been reversed—if a male leader had made such a gesture toward his wife—it would have likely resulted in far harsher public backlash and potential political fallout.
International commentary has not been scarce. On the American talk show The View, co-host Whoopi Goldberg defended the couple, condemning the speculation about their private lives and calling for greater perspective when interpreting such moments. Meanwhile, European tabloids and columnists have published a flurry of op-eds ranging from defending Brigitte’s spontaneity to questioning the optics of the exchange.
The Macrons’ relationship has long drawn attention due to their 25-year age gap and the circumstances of their meeting—Brigitte was Emmanuel’s high school drama teacher. The Vietnam incident has reignited both curiosity and critique regarding the couple’s dynamic, with online forums and mainstream media alike dissecting every frame of the viral clip.
As of this week, the video continues to circulate online, trending across platforms and spawning countless memes and commentary threads. While the Macrons have attempted to move past the moment, it has, at least temporarily, become another chapter in the ongoing story of how personal relationships intersect with the public lives of global leaders.

Celebs
Ms. Rachel Stands Firm Amid Fundraiser Backlash
Ms. Rachel defends fundraiser for children worldwide, staying focused amid backlash and online criticism

Rachel Griffin Accurso, widely known as Ms. Rachel—a cherished YouTube educator celebrated for her Songs for Littles channel—has recently found herself at the center of public attention following a fundraiser intended to help children affected by global conflicts. While many praised her efforts, the initiative also drew criticism, highlighting the challenges of humanitarian advocacy in today’s polarized climate.
In May 2024, Ms. Rachel launched a charitable campaign through Cameo, creating personalized videos to raise money for Save the Children’s emergency fund. The goal was clear: to support children in conflict zones including Gaza, Sudan, Ukraine, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Within just a few hours, she raised over $50,000, prompting her to temporarily pause the campaign due to overwhelming demand.
Although her initiative was widely commended for its compassion and reach, a wave of criticism surfaced online. Some social media users questioned the regions highlighted in her campaign, challenging the perceived balance of representation. Online comments debated whether all affected groups were equally acknowledged, leading to emotionally charged discussions across platforms.
A significant flashpoint involved Ms. Rachel sharing a photo of a malnourished child in Gaza. Some critics argued that the image misrepresented the situation; however, it was later confirmed that the child was suffering from both cystic fibrosis and starvation. The validation of the photo underscored the real, complex suffering children face in conflict zones around the world.
In response to the backlash, Ms. Rachel addressed her followers in a heartfelt social media video, stating, “The bullying is bad. It’s so bad, but I can handle this.”
Her message resonated with many, particularly her emphasis on prioritizing children’s well-being over political divisions. “I care deeply for all children. Palestinian children, Israeli children, children in the US—Muslim, Jewish, Christian children—all children, in every country. Not one is excluded,” she later wrote on Instagram.
Public reaction remained deeply divided. While some criticized her approach, many others rallied in her defense. Supporters flooded social media with messages praising her courage and dedication to vulnerable children.
One TikTok user commented, “Not all heroes wear capes. I’m truly in awe,” capturing the admiration shared across online communities. Reddit discussions echoed similar sentiments, with users appreciating her focus on the humanitarian dimension rather than the politics.
Ms. Rachel’s experience highlights the complexity public figures face when stepping into humanitarian efforts, particularly in politically charged environments. Her situation illustrates how even well-intentioned initiatives can become flashpoints for wider debates. Yet through it all, Ms. Rachel has remained committed to her message: that children, regardless of where they live or who they are, deserve safety, care, and hope.
As the conversation continues, Ms. Rachel’s actions serve as a reminder of the power of compassion—and the importance of keeping children at the heart of humanitarian work. Her resilience in the face of criticism has only strengthened her resolve to use her platform to promote kindness and support those who need it most.
Celebs
Ground Control to Katy Perry: The Internet Isn’t Impressed
Katy Perry’s spaceflight sparks backlash as critics question celebrity privilege and performative symbolism

On 14 April 2025, Blue Origin’s New Shepard NS-31 mission lifted off from Corn Ranch in West Texas, marking what many hailed as a historic moment: the first all-female crewed mission to space since Valentina Tereshkova’s groundbreaking solo flight in 1963. But amid the celebration, the mission has also sparked debate over the true accessibility and purpose of commercial space travel in the modern era.
The suborbital flight, lasting approximately 10 minutes and 21 seconds, carried six women aboard—a diverse group comprising former NASA aerospace engineer Aisha Bowe, civil rights activist Amanda Nguyen, journalist Gayle King, pop superstar Katy Perry, film producer Kerianne Flynn, and pilot and broadcaster Lauren Sánchez, who is also the mission’s curator. The spacecraft soared beyond the Kármán line—106 kilometres above Earth—offering the crew a few weightless minutes before descending safely back to Earth under parachutes.
Each crew member brought with her a distinct narrative. Bowe became the first Bahamian in space; Nguyen, a Nobel Peace Prize nominee and advocate for sexual violence survivors, made history as the first Vietnamese-American woman in space. King overcame her well-documented fear of flying, Perry brought international celebrity attention to the launch, Flynn championed the role of women in film and storytelling, and Sánchez leveraged her aviation experience to coordinate the mission’s message of empowerment.
Once weightless, the crew declared, “Take up space,” as a unifying slogan, with Perry serenading the cabin with “What a Wonderful World.” Their flight was attended by a host of celebrities, including Oprah Winfrey, who celebrated King’s participation, and Orlando Bloom, Perry’s partner.
What Did This Mission Really Accomplish?
While Blue Origin lauded the flight as a milestone for representation and inspiration, critics have questioned its actual significance. Unlike orbital missions that conduct scientific experiments or contribute to space station logistics, NS-31 was purely touristic—lasting barely over ten minutes. The mission did not carry research payloads, technological tests, or humanitarian goals beyond symbolism.
For some, the symbolism is meaningful—showcasing diverse women in a domain long dominated by men. For others, it’s a reminder that space, at least for now, remains the playground of the ultra-wealthy. With tickets costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, the average citizen is far from “taking up space” in any literal sense. Even among private citizens who’ve travelled to space, most come from elite circles of wealth, influence, or celebrity.
Backlash and “Tone-Deaf” Optics
The presence of Katy Perry on the mission drew particular scrutiny—not only because of her fame, but due to a post-flight moment that quickly went viral. Upon exiting the capsule, Perry was seen kissing the ground. While intended to be a gesture of gratitude, it was widely criticised online as performative and out of touch. Many on social media argued that her behaviour trivialised the accomplishment and reflected a lack of awareness of broader global issues, including poverty, war, and climate crises.
Actress Olivia Munn added to the critique, calling the mission “indulgent” and “tone-deaf” given the world’s current struggles. She questioned whether such ventures truly serve humanity or merely stroke the egos of those wealthy enough to afford a seat.
The controversy surrounding Perry also reignited debates about the optics of celebrities participating in what are framed as inspirational missions. While the intention may be to democratise space, the reality—obvious to many observers—is that access remains limited to those with the right bank account or connections.
A Step Forward or a Missed Opportunity?
Despite the criticism, the NS-31 mission remains notable for its emphasis on gender representation and public visibility. It proved that female-led missions can capture global attention and inspire a new generation of space enthusiasts. But whether that inspiration translates into real progress toward inclusive access to space remains to be seen.
For now, missions like NS-31 exist in a grey zone—caught between progress and privilege. While they undeniably advance the visibility of women in spaceflight, they also highlight the economic exclusivity still inherent in the sector. Until tickets are accessible to scientists, educators, and citizens without celebrity or corporate backing, the dream of universal space travel remains aspirational, not actual.
As Blue Origin prepares for its next flight, the world will be watching—both to see who gets to go, and what they choose to do with their moment among the stars.
Celebs
From Batman to Morrison: Val Kilmer’s Brilliant Career Remembered
Val Kilmer, acclaimed actor of Top Gun and The Doors, dies at 65 in LA

Val Kilmer, the versatile and charismatic actor renowned for his roles in films like “Top Gun,” “The Doors,” and “Batman Forever,” passed away on April 1, 2025, at the age of 65 in Los Angeles due to complications from pneumonia. His daughter, Mercedes Kilmer, confirmed that he was surrounded by family and friends at the time of his passing.
Born on December 31, 1959, in Los Angeles, California, Kilmer displayed an early passion for acting. He attended Chatsworth High School alongside future stars like Kevin Spacey and Mare Winningham. At 17, he became the youngest student accepted into the Juilliard School’s drama program at that time.
Kilmer’s breakthrough came with the 1984 spy spoof “Top Secret!” followed by the 1985 comedy “Real Genius.” However, it was his portrayal of Lieutenant Tom “Iceman” Kazansky in the 1986 blockbuster “Top Gun” that catapulted him to stardom. His performance as the cool and confident rival to Tom Cruise’s character became iconic, solidifying his status as a leading man in Hollywood.
In 1991, Kilmer took on the challenging role of Jim Morrison in Oliver Stone’s biographical film “The Doors.” He immersed himself deeply into the character, earning critical acclaim for his portrayal of the legendary rock singer. His dedication to the role showcased his commitment to authenticity and method acting.
Kilmer donned the cape and cowl as the titular character in 1995’s “Batman Forever.” While the film received mixed reviews, his performance was noted for bringing a brooding intensity to the Dark Knight. Reflecting on the role, Kilmer mentioned the challenges posed by the restrictive costume, which made it difficult to move and hear, leading to a sense of isolation on set.
Throughout the 1990s, Kilmer showcased his versatility with roles in films such as “Tombstone” (1993), where he played the ill-fated Doc Holliday, and Michael Mann’s crime thriller “Heat” (1995), starring alongside Al Pacino and Robert De Niro. His portrayal of Holliday was particularly praised for its depth and nuance.
In 2014, Kilmer was diagnosed with throat cancer. He underwent treatments including chemotherapy, radiation, and two tracheotomies, which significantly affected his vocal cords and ability to speak. Initially private about his health struggles, Kilmer opened up in subsequent years, detailing his journey and the challenges he faced during recovery.
Despite these health challenges, Kilmer remained active in the industry. In 2021, he collaborated with a software company to digitally recreate his voice using artificial intelligence, allowing him to continue performing. This technology was notably used in the 2022 film “Top Gun: Maverick,” where he reprised his role as Iceman alongside Tom Cruise.
Kilmer’s final film appearance in “Top Gun: Maverick” was met with admiration, as audiences and critics alike praised his resilience and dedication to his craft. The film depicted his character grappling with health issues, mirroring Kilmer’s real-life challenges. Beyond his film roles, Kilmer was also known for his work in theater, including his one-man show “Citizen Twain,” where he portrayed Mark Twain. His passion for the arts extended to poetry and visual art, showcasing his multifaceted talents.
Tributes poured in from colleagues and fans upon news of his passing. Director Michael Mann remarked, “While working with Val on ‘Heat’ I always marvelled at the range, the brilliant variability within the powerful current of Val’s possessing and expressing character.” Actor Josh Brolin described Kilmer as “a smart, challenging, brave, uber-creative firecracker.”
Kilmer is survived by his two children, Mercedes and Jack, from his marriage to actress Joanne Whalley. His legacy endures through his diverse body of work, reflecting a commitment to exploring complex characters and narratives. As he once reflected in the documentary “Val,” “I have behaved poorly. I have behaved bravely. I have behaved bizarrely to some. I deny none of this and have no regrets because I have lost and found parts of myself that I never knew existed.” Val Kilmer’s journey through Hollywood was marked by a relentless pursuit of artistic truth, leaving an indelible mark on the film industry and audiences worldwide.
-
Business4 months ago
Why Are Planes Falling from the Sky?
-
Opinion4 months ago
How I Spent My Week: Roasting Musk, Martian ICE, and Government Absurdities
-
Politics6 months ago
Comrade Workwear Unveils ‘Most Wanted CEO’ Playing Cards Amidst Controversy
-
Business2 months ago
Trump’s ‘Gold Card’ Visa: Citizenship for Sale at $5 Million a Piece
-
Opinion5 months ago
From Le Pen to Trump: The Far-Right Legacy Behind a Presidential Comeback
-
Politics5 months ago
The Changing Face of Terrorism in 2025
-
Opinion5 months ago
2025: The Turning Point in Global Power and Security
-
Politics3 months ago
Trump and the New World Order