Opinion
From Special Relationship to Strategic Partnership: Redefining U.S.-Israel Ties
Heritage Foundation urges evolving U.S.-Israel alliance from aid dependency to strategic, future-focused partnership model

The Middle East stands at a pivotal moment. From the war-ravaged streets of Gaza to the strategic corridors of Washington and Tel Aviv, the world is watching a region teeter on the edge of transformation. Behind the headlines of missile strikes, diplomatic breakdowns, and resurgent regional rivalries lies a deeper question: Can the United States and Israel redefine their special relationship into one that serves both nations—and the broader Middle East—in the decades to come?
That question forms the heart of a new policy blueprint released by The Heritage Foundation, titled “U.S.-Israel Strategy: From Special Relationship to Strategic Partnership, 2029–2047.” In 65 pages of sweeping strategic insight, the report calls for a bold evolution in the U.S.-Israel alliance, one that moves beyond aid dependency toward a mature, equal partnership based on shared interests and capabilities. Against the backdrop of an increasingly unstable region, the report’s recommendations feel less like an abstract vision and more like an urgent roadmap.
A Region in Turmoil
The timing of the report is no coincidence. Since Hamas launched its attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, killing approximately 1,200 Israelis and taking over 250 hostages, the region has once again spiralled into open warfare. Israel’s military response has been overwhelming. Its stated goal: dismantle Hamas and rescue the hostages. The toll has been catastrophic. More than 50,000 Palestinians are estimated to have been killed. Infrastructures across Gaza lie in ruins. Nearly two million people have been displaced. The scale of the conflict has stunned even longtime observers of the region.
Beyond Gaza, the war has spilled into neighbouring Lebanon and Syria, with Hezbollah launching rockets and Israel responding with airstrikes deep into Beirut’s southern suburbs. In Yemen, the Iran-backed Houthis have entered the fray, targeting Israel and U.S. assets in the Red Sea. The United States, under President Donald Trump’s second administration, has responded forcefully, launching a new wave of airstrikes and dispatching a second aircraft carrier to the region.
This regional unraveling underscores a point made forcefully in the Heritage report: the nature of the U.S.-Israel relationship must evolve in response to geopolitical shifts. Israel is no longer a fledgling state dependent on American protection. It is a regional superpower, with one of the world’s most advanced militaries, a thriving tech sector, and deep diplomatic ties.
Billions in Aid, But to What End?
In the months following the October 2023 attack, the U.S. Congress approved over $17.9 billion in additional military aid to Israel. This is the largest one-year support package since the Eisenhower era. It includes ammunition resupplies, Iron Dome interceptors, precision-guided munitions, and intelligence-sharing operations. For Washington, the aid symbolises unwavering support. For critics, it raises urgent questions: Is this level of aid sustainable? Does it incentivize long-term solutions or enable short-term escalation?
The Heritage Foundation doesn’t propose a sudden withdrawal of American support. Rather, it suggests a structured transition. By 2048—a symbolic year marking Israel’s centenary—the U.S. should phase out Foreign Military Financing (FMF) and instead engage Israel through Foreign Military Sales (FMS). This shift would make Israel a paying partner in U.S. defence procurement rather than a subsidized recipient. The benefits? More balanced burden-sharing, strengthened U.S. industrial interests, and a partnership grounded in capability, not charity.
Trump’s Return and the Future of the Abraham Accords
President Trump’s re-election in 2024 has reignited momentum around the Abraham Accords. These landmark agreements, brokered during his first term, normalised relations between Israel and several Arab states, including the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. But the real prize remains elusive: Saudi Arabia.
The Heritage report notes that integrating Saudi Arabia into the Accords could be the key to lasting regional stability. Riyadh has signalled conditional openness, demanding tangible progress on the Palestinian issue and credible security guarantees from Washington. The Trump administration, eager to secure a diplomatic legacy, has reportedly intensified its efforts, but progress remains elusive.
Here, the report makes a profound point: the Abraham Accords must be more than bilateral deals. They should evolve into a regional framework that aligns Israel’s integration with Palestinian state-building. A U.S.-Israel strategic partnership should facilitate, not obstruct, this process. Otherwise, the peace dividends risk being short-lived.
Strategic Maturity Over Tactical Dependency
To understand why this moment matters, one must see the evolution of the U.S.-Israel relationship. Since 1948, American support for Israel has been driven by shared values, strategic necessity, and domestic political consensus. That support has included over $150 billion in military and economic aid—more than to any other nation.
But relationships must grow. As the report argues, a truly strategic alliance must be defined by reciprocity. The future of the U.S.-Israel partnership should be based on joint defence production, intelligence cooperation, and joint R&D in emerging tech fields like cybersecurity, AI, and missile defence.
Israel is well-positioned to be that kind of partner. It is a leading innovator in drone warfare, missile defence systems (like Iron Dome and David’s Sling), and cyber resilience. With regional threats evolving from state armies to proxy militias and digital warfare, a strategic U.S.-Israel alliance should focus on co-developing technologies that secure both nations.
Rebalancing Without Receding
Critics of rebalancing often argue that reducing aid sends the wrong signal to Israel’s enemies. The Heritage report disagrees. It asserts that strategic maturity enhances deterrence. When Israel is seen not as an American client, but as a peer and partner, it commands greater respect. Similarly, U.S. leadership in the Middle East doesn’t stem solely from dollars spent, but from ideas advanced and coalitions built.
The report proposes several pragmatic steps. First, launch a joint U.S.-Israel Strategic Dialogue focused on long-term planning. Second, establish a trilateral forum with Gulf partners to align missile defence, intelligence sharing, and energy security. Third, leverage the Abraham Accords to create a regional security architecture that complements NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue.
Palestinian Statehood and Regional Credibility
One area where the report treads carefully—but no less critically—is the Palestinian issue. It acknowledges that no strategic partnership can endure if Washington is seen as indifferent to Palestinian suffering. This doesn’t require abandoning Israel. It requires recognising that regional peace and U.S. credibility demand a viable political horizon for Palestinians.
To that end, the U.S. should push for pragmatic governance reforms in the Palestinian Authority, incentivize anti-corruption measures, and condition aid on accountability. Simultaneously, Washington should press Israel to freeze settlement expansion and ease humanitarian conditions in Gaza and the West Bank. These steps won’t solve the conflict overnight, but they would create space for diplomacy—and signal that the U.S.-Israel relationship is consistent with international norms.
A Future Worth Building
The Heritage Foundation’s proposal isn’t radical. It is realistic. It recognises Israel’s transformation from dependent state to empowered ally. It acknowledges that U.S. resources must be used strategically, especially in an era of great-power competition with China and Russia. And it argues, persuasively, that lasting peace in the Middle East won’t come from checkbooks alone.
The Gaza war, the spectre of a multi-front conflict, and the risk of regional escalation underscore the need for a new kind of U.S. leadership. President Trump’s second administration, having inherited both the momentum of the Abraham Accords and the burden of new conflict, has an opportunity to redefine legacy.
The path forward lies not in sentimentality but in strategy. The U.S.-Israel relationship must evolve from a historic bond to a future-focused partnership. One that leads by example, defends shared values, and recognises that in diplomacy—as in life—the most enduring relationships are those that grow together.
The moment to begin that journey is now.

Opinion
The Washington Eye: A Bold Vision in Global and U.S. Journalism

The Washington Eye is an independent news platform founded on a clear mission: to bring truth to light with courage, context, and credibility. We are not just another media outlet — Washington Eye is a sharp, bold vision for modern journalism in a noisy world.
We believe that news should inform, not manipulate. That stories should go deeper than headlines. And that journalism must serve the public, not power.
What We Stand For
🔹 Independent Reporting
The Washington Eye is free from corporate influence and political bias. Our loyalty is to truth and to the readers who seek it.
🔹 Global & U.S. Coverage
From the heart of Washington D.C. to global conflict zones, our reporting spans across politics, economics, social justice, and human stories.
🔹 Critical Thinking
We challenge narratives. We fact-check everything. We ask the hard questions others avoid.
What You’ll Find on Washington Eye:
- Politics: Deep analysis of U.S. government, policy, and elections.
- World News: Geopolitical developments and global affairs.
- Business: Markets, money, and the changing economy.
- Opinion: Thought-provoking insights from independent voices.
- U.S. Focus: Stories that matter to Americans, from coast to coast.
A Platform with Purpose
The Washington Eye exists to empower citizens through accurate information and fearless storytelling. We’re here to shed light — not add to the noise.
Whether you’re a reader, contributor, or simply curious, you’re welcome to be part of a news movement that values clarity, truth, and depth.
Washington Eye — Journalism That Sees Through the Noise.
Business
From Barter to Bitcoin: The Journey and Future of Currency
Currency is trust, coordination, and stability; without it, society and global trade collapse rapidly

by: The Washington Eye
Currency is one of the most significant inventions in human history, yet many of us overlook its importance in our daily lives. At first glance, money seems simple—coins in your pocket, bills in your wallet, or digital numbers in a bank app. But beneath its surface lies a complex system of trust, governance, and economic coordination. Currency works because people believe it works. It is not just a tool for buying and selling; it is a shared agreement among individuals and institutions that a certain object—whether paper, metal, or digital code—holds value and can be exchanged for goods and services.
Before currency came into existence, human societies relied on the barter system. In barter, people exchanged goods and services directly. This method, while natural in small communities, had major limitations. It required a double coincidence of wants: both parties had to want what the other had. If you had wheat and wanted shoes, but the shoemaker didn’t want wheat, you couldn’t trade. Currency solved this problem by serving as a universally accepted medium of exchange. Early currencies included commodities like salt, cattle, or gold—items considered valuable and difficult to fake. Eventually, these evolved into coinage and paper money, often backed by physical commodities such as gold and silver. In modern times, we use fiat money, which has no intrinsic value but is declared legal tender by governments and accepted because people trust the system behind it.
Today, central banks and financial institutions manage currency through complex tools like interest rates, inflation targeting, and money supply regulation. When handled well, these tools can stabilize the economy, foster investment, and generate employment. But mismanagement—such as excessive money printing—can lead to disastrous consequences, including hyperinflation. Historical examples like Zimbabwe or Venezuela demonstrate how quickly a currency can become worthless when public trust is lost. Without faith in currency, prices skyrocket, savings vanish, and economies collapse.
Now imagine a world without currency. Would we return to barter? Perhaps, but that would bring back the same inefficiencies that currency was invented to solve. More likely, alternative systems would emerge. These could include commodity money like gold or oil, decentralized digital currencies such as Bitcoin, or even systems of social credit or labor exchange. Each of these, however, has its flaws. Cryptocurrency, for example, promises decentralization but remains volatile and vulnerable to speculation. Commodity money might favor nations rich in resources and deepen inequality. Social credit systems, while potentially fair, could also become tools of control and surveillance.
A world without currency would likely cause global trade to collapse. Currency provides a common unit of account that allows us to price goods, calculate profits, and manage contracts. Without it, international transactions would become chaotic. Supply chains would stall, and financial markets would lose their foundations. Moreover, debt and long-term contracts rely on stable money. Without currency, these agreements lose meaning. Lending would slow down, investments would halt, and the global economy would become stagnant.
Some idealists imagine a future where money is no longer needed—where technology, automation, and abundance make everything freely accessible. In such a society, resources could be distributed based on need rather than ability to pay. This vision, promoted by movements like The Venus Project, presents a post-currency economy guided by logic and sustainability. But achieving this would require more than technological advancement. It would demand a radical transformation in human behavior, moving from competition to cooperation, and from ownership to shared access. Such a shift, while theoretically possible, is not likely in the near future.
Ultimately, the question is not whether we can eliminate currency, but how we can use it more equitably. As the world becomes increasingly digital, currencies will continue to evolve—through blockchain, central bank digital currencies, and global financial reforms. But the fundamental role of currency as a tool for coordination and trust will remain. Rather than dreaming of a currency-free utopia, our focus should be on building systems that make currency work for everyone, not just the privileged few. Currency is not just about money; it is about meaning, fairness, and the structure of our economic lives. Without it, society as we know it would unravel.

Opinion
The Middle East Bermuda Triangle for Peace and Security
Middle East stability requires KSA-USA-Israel alliance, countering Iran and China, ensuring regional peace

The decades of wars and tensions in the Middle East have reached a point of no return and any ceasefire will not cut the deal for peace and stability in the region. Which is a requirement for the New Middle East and a New World Order by 2030. Therefore, the scenarios of the geopolitics of the region are no longer a classic one with Iran as the “Torch” holder of hegemon. The aging and decaying system of Iran exemplified by the so-called Ayatullah Khamenei the Supreme Leader, becomes irrelevant in a futuristic worldview.
A system based on false theology, or an apocalyptic mission, will only serve as the axis of evil. Such mission was rapidly spreading in the last few years by a movement called “Shiatization” of the world, which is basically a global movement aims to manipulate youth around the world to become paramilitary soldiers implementing a prophecy of the resurrection or “the reappearance” of the 12th Imam Mohammed Al Mahdi a descendent of the Prophet Mohammed according to the Shia sect of Islam. It is important to note that based on this myth; a false claim the Quran does support; the Shiatization movement has a significant role of destruction and in creation of a total dystopia as a pre-requisite condition for “the reappearance” to happen.
Therefore, the Middle East and particularly the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) have stepped in as a prominent power in the region with a clear vision of 2030 for the Middle East. The KSA under the Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS) have taken bold steps to strengthen the relationship with the United States with President Trump in Office. The two leaders of a vastly different worlds and backgrounds, have significant and noticeable friendship as business men and Heads of States. The world witnessed the success of the Saudi-American Economic Forum in Riyad in May 2025, and massive investments for years to come. Granting the sanctions lift of Syria and allowing its new leadership to have a chance to stabilize Syria and save the lives of millions of the Syrian people, meant a lot for MBS and showed confidence in his regional leadership. Same goes with the other Gulf Countries during President Trump’s visit to the region to ensure that Arabs are solid allies to the United States of America. What is remarkable about Trump and MBS, is that both share the undeniable prospect of the Middle East once it has peace and stability in place. The 2030 vision of the Crown Prince MBS is that eliminating the Iranian/IRGC intrusive violent interference of the proxies in Iraq, Syria (under Assad), Lebanon with Hezbollah, Houthis in Yemen and Hamas in Gaza. Only then, the alliance of Arab nations could enter into real peace agreements with Israel.
Furthermore, the U.S.-Israel relationship will also need to step up given the decades of alliance and ironclad ties, Israel, cannot live in isolation from its regional neighbors. Thus, a Bermuda Triangle must be secured as KSA-USA-Israel. The US as the trusted ally to both countries, and Trump as a trustworthy leader to both MBS and Benjamin Netanyahu. Both who might seem rivalries, they are in fact have more in common including a core value of peace and security in the region. The tactics or approaches might differ significantly, but that can be addressed through soft-diplomacy the trademark of KSA, not the arm twisting, but rather building on common grounds. For instance, both leaders count on the peoples in the region, Arab Muslims, Kurds, Druz, Christians, Jews, Persians, Bloshs, Azaris, and many other ethnic and religious minority groups. Both leaders want to establish and secure economic prosperity and wealth of resources including sustainable energy resources and agriculture. Therefore, if President Trump could bring KSA and Israel to the negotiation table with realistic expectation rather than selling new maps, the future of the region would very well be worth every effort for peace.
Finally, how Middle East Bermuda Triangle effect the United States? i.e. what is the Return of Investment for the America First and Make America Great Again? The wealthy region will be entirely a strong ally to the US, not only economically, but also in every industry concerns the American superiority such as the energy, minerals, trades, water passages, and overall presence. The Middle East peace and security or as I call it the “Bermuda Triangle” will be a massive buffer zone against China which is creeping into Africa using Iran as its proxy which is actively spreading the Shiatization movement that entails more terrorists’ organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, and the militias in Iraq. The alliance between Iran and Egypt and Algeria is not for bilateral diplomatic relations, but rather a destruction power to threaten Israel and to sabotage the West Sahara Desert Agreement with Morocco. China through Iran will increase their exploitation to African countries to ensure destabilization and attacks on U.S. interests in the continent. In addition, the China-Iran alliance have funded operations, based on open-source intelligence reports, to reach American soil by exploiting open border policy of the Biden Administration, and have established training and grooming camps in Cuba and Venezuela.
In conclusion, the Bermuda Triangle Peace and Security of the Middle East through the U.S., the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Israel is a necessity for world peace and security; by forcing the Islamic Republic of Iran to hand down its torch of hegemon by Peace through Strength Policy of the U.S. of the Trump Administration. The power of KSA and Israel together will hold the fragile region together and build it up from ruins. The KSA legitimately can unite the Arab countries for peace and stability without leaving Israel in isolation. While the U.S. will have a greater presence with solidified allies and partners to counter the greater global threat of China and its proxy of Iran.

-
Business5 months ago
Why Are Planes Falling from the Sky?
-
Opinion5 months ago
How I Spent My Week: Roasting Musk, Martian ICE, and Government Absurdities
-
Business3 months ago
Trump’s ‘Gold Card’ Visa: Citizenship for Sale at $5 Million a Piece
-
Politics4 months ago
Trump and the New World Order
-
Politics7 months ago
Comrade Workwear Unveils ‘Most Wanted CEO’ Playing Cards Amidst Controversy
-
Politics6 months ago
The Changing Face of Terrorism in 2025
-
Opinion6 months ago
From Le Pen to Trump: The Far-Right Legacy Behind a Presidential Comeback
-
Opinion6 months ago
2025: The Turning Point in Global Power and Security