During a recent interview, U.S. President Donald Trump stated that Russia holds the upper hand in potential peace talks regarding Ukraine. He attributed this leverage to Russia’s territorial gains, asserting, “They have the cards… because they’ve taken a lot of territory”.
Trust in Russia’s Peace Intentions
Trump expressed trust in Russia’s desire to end the conflict, which began with Moscow’s full-scale invasion nearly three years ago. “I do,” he confirmed when asked if he believed Russia sought peace.
Criticism of Zelensky and Election Claims
Trump reignited controversy by labeling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky a “dictator,” criticizing the suspension of Ukrainian elections under martial law. He claimed Zelensky’s popularity was dwindling, citing an alleged 4% approval rating. However, BBC Verify contradicted this, reporting a 57% trust level among Ukrainians.
International Backlash and Diplomatic Strain
The “dictator” remark drew condemnation from European leaders, including German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who called it “wrong and dangerous.” UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer reaffirmed support for Zelensky in a follow-up call.
U.S.-Russia Talks Exclude Ukraine
Amidst these tensions, U.S. and Russian officials held direct talks in Saudi Arabia without Ukrainian representation. Trump controversially suggested Ukraine bore responsibility for the war, saying, “You should have never started it. You could have made a deal.”
Looking Ahead
Trump’s assertion that Russia holds the upper hand in peace negotiations highlights a significant shift in the narrative surrounding the Ukraine conflict. By suggesting Ukraine could have avoided the war through early concessions, Trump not only aligns with Russia’s perspective but also challenges the prevailing Western stance supporting Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
The exclusion of Ukraine from U.S.-Russia talks underscores the fragility of Kyiv’s position in future negotiations. As diplomatic efforts continue, the core question remains: will peace come at the cost of legitimizing Russia’s territorial gains, or can Ukraine reassert its voice in shaping the outcome?
